Britain’s Unemployment Set to Hit 3 Million by 2011

Source: ForexYard

printprofile

Britain’s economy is set to continue its downward spiral into 2011. Economists previously forecasted that Britain’s economy will recover by the third quarter of 2010. However, forecasts have been adjusted due to the worse than previously expected financial crisis that Britain is going through.

At the end of 2008, the Confederation of British Industry (CBI) predicted that unemployment may reach a peak of 3 million people by the 3rd quarter of 2010. The CBI recently met with the Chancellor of the Exchequer Alistair Darling, and discussed the current economic crisis, which has hit Britain more than its neighbors, such as Germany, France, and Italy.

The leader of the opposition, David Cameron also clashed in Parliament with Prime Minister Gordon Brown, regarding whether to increase the current level of capital spending of 5 billion pounds to boost the economy. Cameron argues that Brown has not done enough to increase the fiscal stimulus of the British economy.

Market analysts forecast that London will be hit more than other cities in Britain due to the way in which the economy of each of these cities has grown in recent years. It is forecasted that up to 500,000 London jobs are set to be cut by the 1st quarter of 2011.

The number of people that are claiming unemployment benefits in Britain has increased to its highest level since the early 1990s. This has added additional negative pressure to an economy which is already in a deep crisis. Economists believe that the economy will start to recover by the 3rd quarter of 2011. However, in the short-medium term, Britain’s economy will continue to be one of the worst affected by the current economic crisis in the European Union.

Forex Market Analysis provided by ForexYard.

© 2006 by FxYard Ltd

Disclaimer: Trading Foreign Exchange carries a high level of risk and may not be suitable for all investors. There is a possibility that you could sustain a loss of all of your investment and therefore you should not invest money that you cannot afford to lose. You should be aware of all the risks associated with Foreign Exchange trading.

Monetary Policy Week in Review – July 14, 2012

By Central Bank News
      The past week in monetary policy saw interest rate decisions by 11 central banks around the world, with five cutting rates, one raising its rate and the remaining five keeping rates unchanged.

    The message from central banks was loud and clear: The euro area’s debt crises is creating nervousness in financial markets and the global economy is slowing down, leading to lower demand for commodities from many emerging economies. On the positive side, domestic demand remains solid in many countries and declining inflation is giving central banks room to cut interest rates.

   MONETARY POLICY DECISIONS:
COUNTRY
        NEW RATE
       OLD RATE
        RATE 1 YR AGO
BRAZIL
8.00%
8.50%
12.50%
S.KOREA
3.00%
3.25%
3.25%
JAPAN
0.10%
0.10%
0.10%
INDONESIA
5.75%
5.75%
6.75%
PERU
4.25%
4.25%
4.25%
SRI LANKA
7.75%
7.75%
7.75%
TAJIKISTAN
6.80%
8.00%
9.00%
ARMENIA
8.00%
8.00%
8.50%
KENYA
16.50%
18.00%
6.25%
LATVIA
3.00%
3.50%
3.50%
SERBIA
10.25%
10.00%
11.75%
   
    
    NEXT WEEK:
    Looking at the central bank calendar for next week, there are expectations that South Africa may follow the trend toward lower rates while Canada is expected to keep rates on hold.
Jul-17
CAD
Canada
Bank of Canada
Jul-19
ZAR
South Africa
South African Reserve Bank
Jul-19
TRY
Turkey
Central Bank of Turkey
Jul-20
MXN
Mexico
Banco de Mexico
www.CentralBankNews.info

  

What the GLD ETF Chart tells us about GOLD

David A. Banister, Chief Strategist –www.markettrendforecast.com on GOLD July 12, 2012

Gold had remained in a rough 1550-1640 range for several weeks now. Tonight, we look at the GLD ETF, which represents the Gold spot price movements.  Over the past 5 months we can see in the chart below  the clear downtrend lines.

Recently, in the past 6 weeks we have seen a series of 3 higher lows including today where a lower gap filled in and then Gold reversed upwards.

What Gold needs to do, in terms of this GLD ETF is clear the 158 hurdle on a closing basis to set up a stage for a new advance. I would expect in the intervening months to October for Gold to continuing meandering and correcting to as low as 1445-1455, my longstanding Gold worst case low targets I’ve had since last September.

Near term key levels are 150 on the downside and 158 on the upside. If we close below 150 on GLD ETF then we should be looking for my 1445-1455 areas to be hit this summer before a low. If we clear 158 on the GLD ETF, then the triple bottom at 1520 is likely confirmed and we can start tracking some upside for Gold.

David A. Banister, Chief Strategist –www.markettrendforecast.com

 

Gold Rises But “Keeps Bearish Bias” as Beijing Investment Bucks China Slowdown

London Gold Market Report
from Ben Traynor
BullionVault
Fri 13 July, 08:10 EST

U.S. DOLLAR prices to buy gold rose to $1586 per ounce Friday morning in London, reversing losses from the previous two days but leaving gold more than 2% below its level of a month ago.

“Gold has been a range trade with a bearish bias given the progressively lower highs since late February,” says the latest technical analysis from bullion bank Scotia Mocatta.

Prices to buy silver meantime climbed briefly above $27.50 per ounce Friday morning, as stocks, commodities and government bonds all ticked higher – with the exception of Spanish and Italian stock markets, which dipped following news of a ratings downgrade for Italy.

Heading into the weekend, prices to buy gold with Dollars were more or less unchanged on the week, while silver prices were up around 25¢ from last Friday.

Euro gold prices meantime looked set for a 0.7% weekly gain, with the Euro/Dollar exchange rate dipping back below $1.22 this morning.

New data from China today said the world’s second-largest economy grew at an annual rate of 7.6% in the second quarter of the year, slowing down from 8.1% in Q1, according to official GDP data.

“The expectation for weakness in the second quarter was pretty strong,” says BNP Paribas economist Ken Peng in Beijing.

Fixed asset investment by state firms however showed a 13.8% annual increase in June – up from 10.0% a month earlier – while overall fixed investment growth ticked higher to 20.4%, up from 20.1% in May.

“The investment number is the surprise,” says BNP’s Peng. “There appears to have been a significant pick-up. That is [stimulus] policy beginning to work…we are looking for a small rebound in the third quarter and a bigger rebound in the fourth quarter.”

China’s central bank has twice cut interest rates in recent weeks.

“In China,” says today’s commodities note from Commerzbank, “bank deposits are likely no longer to be nominally profitable soon, following the recent reduction of the deposit interest rate by the central bank to 3%.

“We continue to regard gold as an attractive means of protecting one’s capital against inflation…Negative real interest rates on the one hand and the high [inflation] risks on the other should lend support to the price of gold in the medium to long term.”

China has overtaken India in recent months to become the world’s biggest source of demand to buy gold.

Over in Europe, Italy managed to sell €5.25 billion  of government debt Friday, despite being downgraded last night by ratings agency Moody’s. The average yield on 3-year debt at today’s auction was 4.65% – down from 5.3% paid last month at an auction of similar bonds.

A day earlier, Moody’s downgraded Italy to two notches above junk, and one notch above Spain.

“Italy’s near-term economic outlook has deteriorated, as manifest in both weaker growth and higher unemployment, which creates risk of failure to meet fiscal consolidation targets,” a Moody’s statement said.

“[This] in turn could weaken market confidence further, raising the risk of a sudden stop in market funding.”

In Madrid, Spain’s government could take control of budgets in regions that fail to meet deficit targets, Spanish  budget minister Cristobal Montoro said Thursday. The national government may in return help regional governments to finance themselves, though Montoro denies this would take the form of jointly-issued debt.

“This idea of hispabonds in the sense of mutualizing risk has never been on table,” said Montoro.

Germany’s government last month agreed to underwrite regional debt, and from next year states could start issuing debt for which they and the federal government are jointly liable.

Here in London, the Bank of England and HM Treasury have launched their Funding for Lending scheme, which aims to increase lending by financial institutions to the “real economy” by up to £80 billion.

Ben Traynor
BullionVault

Gold value calculator   |   Buy gold online at live prices

Editor of Gold News, the analysis and investment research site from world-leading gold ownership service BullionVault, Ben Traynor was formerly editor of the Fleet Street Letter, the UK’s longest-running investment letter. A Cambridge economics graduate, he is a professional writer and editor with a specialist interest in monetary economics.

(c) BullionVault 2011

Please Note: This article is to inform your thinking, not lead it. Only you can decide the best place for your money, and any decision you make will put your money at risk. Information or data included here may have already been overtaken by events – and must be verified elsewhere – should you choose to act on it.

 

Oil, Gold, Asia & the Best Investment in the World Right Now – An Interview with Jim Rogers By OilPrice.com

By OilPrice.com

World markets appear to be hovering over a precipice as Europe’s sovereign debt crisis, slowdowns in India and China and further bank downgrades threaten to send stocks and commodities down even further. Falling oil and gas prices may offer some respite to consumers but are they enough to help the economy or are they a symptom of deeper problems?

To help Oilprice.com look at these issues and more we are joined by the well known investor, adventurer and author Jim Rogers. Jim is the creator of the Rogers International Commodity Index, he also recently completed a book called: A Gift to my Children – which helps people learn from their triumphs and mistakes in order to achieve a prosperous, well-lived life. Please click on the following link to find out more information on A Gift to my Children.

In the interview Jim talks about the following:

  • Why recent oil price falls are a good buying opportunity
  • Why oil prices could fall to $40 a barrel
  • Investment opportunities with the renewable energy sector
  • Why he is optimistic about Nuclear energy
  • Why agriculture offers good opportunities to investors
  • Why Myanmar is the best investment opportunity in the world right now
  • Why there could be further unrest in the Middle East
  • Why we should let Greece fail

Interview conducted by. James Stafford of Oilprice.com

 

Oilprice.com: Jim, thanks for taking the time to join us today.

Jim Rogers: I’m delighted to be here, James. My pleasure.

Oilprice.com:It’s been an interesting period in the energy world as we’ve seen oil prices steadily decline over the past few months and with the problems in Europe and slowdowns in India and China do you expect this trend to continue?

Jim Rogers: Well, there is certainly a correction going on for various reasons. I think Saudi Arabia’s trying to help re-elect Mr. Obama. There are also stories that JP Morgan has problems in its London office with a lot of unauthorized positions they’re having to liquidate. I don’t know what’s going on, but I do know that corrections are normal in the industrial world. There’s nothing unusual about it. If it continues, there’s an opportunity to buy more.

Oilprice.com: I read a report by the Economist Phil Verleger who thinks that the Saudi’s massive increase in oil production along with other economic problems could cause oil prices crash to $40 a barrel oil and $2 a gallon gasoline by November. Do you think this is a reasonable forecast and we could see oil at these levels?

Jim Rogers: We could see anything. We certainly saw lower prices than that back in 2008 when there was a collapse. When things are collapsing, all sorts of strange things happen. We found that out in 2008 and we will probably find out in the future, as well. If oil does go to $40, that means it’ll just be setting up an even more bullish scenario for the duration of the bull market.

Oilprice.com: How do you see the energy markets reacting to the Iranian sanctions, which are going to be coming into effect on the first of July?

Jim Rogers: Oh, I don’t see that having much effect at all. Everybody already knows about that – nothing new to the markets. They have long since adjusted to this news, whether it be stock markets, smuggling, etc. The Iranian sanctions are a non-event as far as I’m concerned.

Now, an attack on Iran would not be a non-event, but this is just more noise.

Oilprice.com: The Middle East Petocracy’s, along with Venezuela and Russia must be nervously watching the price of oil. Can you see potential problems developing in these countries and other oil producing nations if prices continue to fall?

Jim Rogers: That’s part of what I was saying before. The lower prices go for the fundamentals, the price of fundamentals improve, but for these countries the money they have available to buy peace is running out and there are going to be problems, because a lot of people have been lead to believe that the government can solve their problems and if the government runs out of money, it makes people upset.

Oilprice.com: Crude oil has dropped from $108 a barrel in February to $84 today. Do you think low oil prices could provide an economic stimulus?

Jim Rogers: Certainly, it’s an economic stimulus for everybody who buys oil. There’s no question about that. On the other hand, for people who produce oil, it’s a negative. Now obviously more of us buy oil than produce oil, but it’s important to remember it does cut both ways.

Oilprice.com: Less than 0.1% of U.S. cars and trucks run on natural gas and with falling natural gas prices and America’s dependence on oil and vulnerability to oil price shocks – I was hoping to get your thoughts on natural gas usage for transportation?

Jim Rogers: Well, If natural gas stays this low compared to oil prices, it does give an incentive to develop natural gas powered vehicles and I think we are going to see more and more developments here. Is it going to end the use of oil, combustion engines? Probably not any time soon. Someday it could, but someday is a long way away.

Oilprice.com: Do you believe natural gas prices are near to a bottom, or do you think they have further to fall?

Jim Rogers: U.S. natural gas is somewhere near its bottom, in my view. The problem is I expect to see serious economic problems in 2013 and 2014 in the U.S. If and when that happens, we’re going to see a final panic in the markets and the economy and everything will have a crescendo and a selling climax.
We’re certainly a lot closer than we were. Although, when you have a selling climax in markets, you go to levels much lower than most people believe possible and that may happen. Whatever that bottom is, it’s not too far from the recent lows in natural gas.

Natural gas in many other places such as the UK are much, much higher than they are in the U.S.

Oilprice.com: The Arab Spring shook energy markets in 2011 – are there any potential geopolitical events taking place apart from the Iranian situation that could cause oil prices to skyrocket?

Jim Rogers: There are always geo-political possibilities. If oil goes down, Saudi Arabia’s going to have more trouble buying peace. Any country’s going to have more problems buying peace.

Iraq is being driven into the arms of Iran. America has spent staggering amounts of money in this region, and what we’re getting for it is a possible alliance between Iran and Iraq.

All sorts of things could happen in the future, especially if Iran and Iraq get closer together. That’s going to put America in a terrible situation, the world in a terrible situation. The good news is the world is always changing dramatically. The bad news is, the world is always changing dramatically.

Oilprice.com:The media has gotten behind shale gas and it’s being promoted as a worldwide energy saviour. What are your thoughts on shale gas? Do you think it’s been oversold or it really is the cheap and plentiful oil extender we have been hoping for?

Jim Rogers: I don’t know how cheap it is. The technology’s getting better, apparently. The cost too because the environmentalists and politicians are getting worried about it. But I don’t know enough about the technology to know for sure. I do have confidence in mankind and someday we will have the technology and expertise to fully exploit these resources.

Someday’s still a long way away though, and in my case, I don’t know how long life the fields are. If these are short-lived fields and short-lived wells this is nothing more than a flash in a pan, which may last for a few years.

Oilprice.com:Moving away from fossil fuels – I was hoping to get your opinion on renewable energy. Do you see this as a sector investors should be avoiding – or are there opportunities here in the future?

Jim Rogers: That is your premise, if oil stays high alternatives become more competitive. Most alternative energy is not competitive at this moment in time but that could change.

If oil prices go down and stay down the subsidies for alternatives are going to have to be pretty massive to make it even viable.

However, having said that, if you can find competent companies that can make money in the field, they’ll make a fortune. Find the right companies and you’ll do well.

Oilprice.com: Are there any alternative sectors you’re more bullish on than others? Say solar, wind, geothermal, hydro?

Jim Rogers: No, no. They all have pluses and minuses. I’d be most optimistic about the ones that are economically competitive. I guess atomic energy is most economically competitive.

Oilprice.com: What are your thoughts on nuclear energy? Is there a future for this power source or due to public safety perceptions is it something politicians will feel forced to abandon or sideline?

Jim Rogers: I don’t think people will abandon atomic energy. It is competitive, it is economic, it is very clean if controlled. If it’s not controlled it’s a disaster of course. I suspect you’re going to see another revival of atomic energy. The French, the Koreans, the Chinese, many countries are going forward with their nuclear power development plans.

Oilprice.com: I’ve seen in other interviews that you’ve predicted that 2013 and 2014 will be bad years for the economy. What is an investor to do? Are there any commodities, stock or instrument people can go to for safety and capital preservation?

Jim Rogers: No such thing as safe when you talk about it. Even if you put your money in cash, if you put your money in the wrong cash, you lose a lot of money. As the people in Iceland have found out, as the people in Europe on the Euro have found out. So, no such thing as safe.

What I have done is I own commodities on the theory that if the world economy gets better, I’ll make money because of shortages. If the world economy does not get better, people will print money. The best way to save yourself when money printing is going on is to own commodities.

It does not mean between here and there, they can’t go down in a panic. In the meantime, commodities will be the thing to rally once that happens, but they can go down. Therefore, I have also short stocks as a hedge against myself. If the world economy doesn’t get better, you’re going to be losing a lot of money in stocks.

Oilprice.com: Now are there any commodities you’re particularly bullish on at this moment in time?

Jim Rogers: I’m more optimistic about agriculture than anything else, just because of the price. Most agriculture, I feel very depressed on the risk side basis. Sugar is 75% below where it was 38 years ago. There’s not much in the world that’s as depressed as agricultural current prices. So, I would say agriculture.

Oilprice.com:You’ve owned gold for 11 years now and the price is currently correcting. Do you see this as a buying opportunity or would you wait a little longer?

Jim Rogers: I’ve actually owned gold for longer than 11 years. I’m not buying now. Gold went up 11 years in a row, which is extremely unusual for any asset. I don’t know of any asset in history that’s gone up 11 years in a row without a correction.

Corrections are normal and are the way things should work, the way things do work. Having said that, I don’t know when the correction will stop. It’s normal in my experience for corrections to go down 30 or 40%. It’s just the way markets work.

Gold has not gone down that much. It’s only gone down that much once in the past 11 years, and even then it ended the year up. I’m not buying gold at the moment. If it goes down a lot, I hope I’m smart enough to buy a lot more. I’m certainly not selling my gold, because I suspect gold will be much, much, much higher over the next decade.

James: You’ve mentioned in the past that you’re bullish on Asia. Where do you see the best opportunities for investors in this region at present?

Jim Rogers: Probably the best investment opportunity in the world right now is Myanmar. In 1962, Myanmar was the richest country in Asia. They closed off in 1962, and now it’s the poorest country in Asia. I see enormous opportunities there because they’re now opening up. It’s like when China opened up in 1978. There were unbelievable opportunities going forward. The same is true in Myanmar now in my view. North Korea, I expect to see the same sorts of developments.

Oilprice.com:You’ve mentioned previously that the 21st century belongs to China. But China has some serious internal problems as its political stability depends heavily on rapid economic growth. We are also seeing increasing tensions between the wealthy coastal regions and the poor interior. My question is do you think the internal forces building up in China can be managed as China is held together by money not ideology?

Jim Rogers: What you just said about China’s true of every country in the world, more so in places like America and Europe than in China. China does have internal problems. But their economy’s much stronger than the western economies. You had riots in the streets in the U.K., what, last summer. Terrible instability, and there’s going to be much more in the west. Greece, Spain, Portugal, these countries have staggering instability.

In America in the 1930s we certainly had all sorts of political problems and yet survived, partly because America was a very large credit nation and had the assets to see us through.

America came out of that and became the most successful country in the 20th century. China’s going to have plenty of problems. Plenty. I’d still rather invest in China than in other

places.

Oilprice.com:You mentioned that with Spain and Greece we should just let them go bankrupt – what do you really see the implications of this being. Will it be as bad as we have been led to believe?

Jim Rogers: Might be worse. The good news is we’ll get their problems behind us. The way the system is supposed to work is when people fail, they fail. Then you come in, you reorganize. Competent people come in, reorganize, and start over with a sound base. This has been going on for thousands of years.

It’s a little bit like a forest fire. When you have a forest fire, it’s terrible, terrible, but it cleans out the underbrush, cleans out the dead wood. The forest, when it’s all over, is much stronger and has much better growth.

Same with financial problems and bankruptcies. You start over and things are better.

 

Oilprice.com: Now, moving away from the markets, I was hoping you could tell us a little bit about your book, “A Gift to my Children,” the inspiration behind writing it and what you hope it achieves.

Jim Rogers: Well, I came into parenthood late and I never wanted to have children. I thought children were a terrible waste of time and money and energy. I felt sorry for friends who had children. Then I had some.

I’ve had some failures in my life, I’ve had a few triumphs. I started writing down the things I learned. I wanted to make sure my children knew all of these things. That turned into a

magazine article, and the next thing you know it turned into a little book.

Grownups get a lot more out of it than children do because it’s really a book for grownups.

Oilprice.com: What are lessons within the book? Why would I go out and buy the book? What am I going to learn?

Jim Rogers: I hope you’ll learn to be famous, happy, rich and successful.

Being happy, that’s the main thing I’m trying to help with. If you’re happy, not much else matters in life, at least in my experience. There’s various ways to be happy, of course. I’m trying to tell people the things that I have learned. I’m trying to teach them to be curious, independent. It’s very hard to think independently, as you probably know. Extremely hard. Most people are not very curious, If they see it on TV, that’s what they accept instead of thinking, what’s really going on here?

I’m teaching readers to be curious, skeptical, independent thinkers.

 

Oilprice.com: Fantastic. Jim, thank you ever so much for taking the time to speak with us. It’s been a pleasure speaking with you.

Jim Rogers: My pleasure

 

To find out more about Jim’s book A Gift to My Children – please visit Amazon for more details.

Interview by James Stafford of Oilprice.com

 

USD Hits Fresh 2-Year High against Euro

Source: ForexYard

The US dollar climbed to a fresh two-year high against the euro yesterday, as investor pessimism in the euro-zone economic recovery combined with a better than expected US Unemployment Claims figure helped boost the greenback. As markets prepare to close for the weekend, traders will want to pay attention to several potentially significant news events which could generate volatility. If the Italian 10-year bond auction show that borrowing costs in Italy has gone up, the euro could see additional losses during mid-day trading. Furthermore, the US Producer Price Index, scheduled to be released at 12:30 GMT, could help the dollar extend its recent gains if it comes in above the forecasted -0.5%.

Economic News

USD – Dollar Continues to Gain on Riskier Currencies

The dollar extended its recent bullish trend against several of its higher-yielding currency rivals yesterday, as fears regarding the state of the global economic recovery led to an increase in risk aversion. A significantly worse than expected Australian Employment Change figure sent the AUD/USD down over 140 pips for the day. The pair eventually found support around the 1.0110 level. The GBP/USD fell more than 80 pips over the course of the day, eventually reaching as low as 1.5431 during the afternoon session.

As we close out the week, the dollar could potentially extend its recent gains after today’s Producer Price Index (PPI) is released at 12:30 GMT. Analysts are forecasting the PPI to come in at -0.5%, which if true, would represent an improvement over last month’s -1.0% and could help boost confidence in the US economic recovery. Furthermore, if an Italian bond auction today indicates that there is poor demand for Italian debt, investors may continue shifting their funds to safe-haven currencies which could help the greenback.

EUR – Euro Tumbles to Fresh Lows

The euro fell against several of its main currency rivals yesterday, including the USD and JPY, as investors remained concerned about the implications of the euro-zone debt crisis and the lack of a plan to stop it from spreading to other countries in the region. The EUR/USD hit a fresh two-year low at 1.2165 during mid-day trading. Overall, the pair fell over 60 pips for the day. Against the Japanese yen, the euro was down over 100 pips for the day, eventually hitting 96.41 before staging a minor upward correction.

Turning to today, traders will want to carefully monitor the results of an Italian 10-year bond auction. One of the main reasons behind the euro’s recent bearish trend is the rapidly increasing borrowing costs in Spain and Italy. Should today’s bond auction show that borrowing costs have gone up further, it may lead to fears that Italy will need a bailout in the near future, in which case, the euro could see additional losses before markets close for the weekend.

Gold – Gold Resumes Downward Trend

After seeing moderate gains earlier in the week, gold resumed its downward trend yesterday as a bullish US dollar made the precious metal more expensive for international buyers. The price of gold fell be close to $15 an ounce during European trading, eventually reaching as low as $1555.01 before staging a minor upward correction.

Turning to today, gold traders will want to pay attention to the results of the Italian 10-year bond auction. If the news leads to an increase in risk aversion in the marketplace, the safe-haven dollar could see additional gains in which case the price of gold may fall further.

Crude Oil – International News Causes the Price of Oil to Drop

The price of crude oil fell throughout the day yesterday, as negative news out of Australia and the euro-zone led to fears that global demand for the commodity will fall. Furthermore, a strengthened US dollar resulted in oil becoming more expensive for international investors. Crude fell by over $1 a barrel during the European session, eventually reaching as low as $84.21.

Whether oil will be able to rebound before markets close for the weekend today will largely be dependent on news out of the euro-zone. If the Italian 10-year bond auction signals poor demand for Italian debt, investor fears regarding the pace of the global economic recovery may intensify, which could result in further losses for oil.

Technical News

EUR/USD

The daily chart’s Williams Percent Range has crossed over into oversold territory, indicating that this pair could see an upward correction in the near future. This theory is supported by the Slow Stochastic on the same chart, which has formed a bullish cross. Going long may be the wise choice.

GBP/USD

Most long-term technical indicators place this pair in neutral territory, meaning that no defined trend can be predicted at this time. Traders may want to take a wait and see approach, as a clearer picture is likely to present itself in the near future.

USD/JPY

While the daily chart’s MACD/OsMA has formed a bearish cross, indicating that this pair could see downward movement in the near future, most other technical indicators show this pair range-trading. Traders may want to take a wait and see approach until a clearer trend can be determined.

USD/CHF

The Relative Strength Index on the daily chart has crossed over into overbought territory, indicating that downward movement could occur in the near future. Furthermore, the Slow Stochastic on the same chart has formed a bearish cross. Going short may be the wise choice for this pair.

The Wild Card

NZD/CHF

The daily chart’s Relative Strength Index has crossed over into overbought territory, indicating that this pair could see a downward correction in the near future. Furthermore, the MACD/OsMA on the same chart has formed a bearish cross. This may be a good opportunity for forex traders to open short positions.

Forex Market Analysis provided by ForexYard.

© 2006 by FxYard Ltd

Disclaimer: Trading Foreign Exchange carries a high level of risk and may not be suitable for all investors. There is a possibility that you could sustain a loss of all of your investment and therefore you should not invest money that you cannot afford to lose. You should be aware of all the risks associated with Foreign Exchange trading.

 

Spain’s New Austerity Plan: What Does it Mean?

By The Sizemore Letter

The negotiations between Spain and her Eurozone partners continue.

Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy agreed to new austerity measures, released on Wednesday, as a means of avoiding a full state bailout and the loss of control to the EU’s supervisory institutions that this would entail.  In total, the moves would cut Spain’s budget deficit by €65 billion.

The value-added (i.e. sales) tax would be raised by 3 points to 21 percent—a questionable move that would dampen already weak consumer demand during a deep recession—and there would be cuts to unemployment benefits and pay and benefits to state workers.  Also on the table was the subject of pensions, though no cuts were announced at this time.  Rajoy promised to consult with the opposition Socialists before pushing through any reforms to Spain’s generous retirement system.

Though it was not announced as such, the moves appear to be part of a quid pro quo.  In return for the austerity moves, Spain will be given more time to get its budget deficit in check and it would avoid the humiliation and loss of control that come with a full state bailout.

Investors seemed to take the news well.  Spanish stocks (iShares MSCI Spain—$EWP) were up big today (one of the few countries not in the red), and Spanish 10-year bond yields eased under the psychologically-important 7% level.

There is an obvious question raised here:  Why does Spain appear to be getting special treatment that the rest of the problem countries do not?

To this, I have two simple answers.  First: size matters.

Spain is the fourth-largest economy in the Eurozone (after Germany, France and Italy), and with size comes power.  If Ireland or Greece blows up, it really doesn’t matter.  All of the fretting about Greece in recent years was not over the failure of Greece itself.  Frankly, no one cares about Greece.  If the country broke off of the European continent and sank into the Aegean Sea, it wouldn’t make a lick of difference to the global economy.

The fears over Greece were that failure would lead to contagion—to Spain and Italy. When Greece demands that its bailout be renegotiated, Germany’s Angela Merkel has the luxury of flicking them away with her index finger as if they were a buzzing gnat.  Spain is a different story.  Spain knows that it is big enough and important enough to the health of the Eurozone to negotiate.  And the rest of Europe knows that too.  If Spain or Italy sinks, so does Europe.

The second reason that Spain gets special treatment is that Spain’s crisis is very different from that of Greece.  In the case of Greece, the Greek government borrowed and spent funds it could never hope to repay and went so far as to lie about it.  This has left little room for sympathy among Greece’s Eurozone peers.

But in the case of Spain, government debt was actually lower than that of Germany prior to the onset of the 2008 crisis, and its budget enjoyed a modest surplus.  It was the collapse of the Spanish property market and banking system that sank the economy, and the gaping budget deficits were the result of the deep recession that followed. So Spain has a certain “good faith” element that Greece clearly does not.

What all of this mean for the rest of the EU countries receiving bailouts?

It means different things for different countries.  Ireland’s crisis is very similar to that of Spain—driven by a collapse of the property and banking sectors—and the Irish have endured austerity with remarkable grit.  The EU is renegotiating parts of its bailout, and in the end Ireland may get a deal that looks closer to Spain’s.  Specifically, it appears that some of Ireland’s debt will be shifted to its banks and off the sovereign balance sheet.

Greece should expect no such concessions for the reasons outlined above.

But what about Italy? Under the technocratic government of Mario Monti, Italy has largely done with the EU has asked of it and has made needed reforms.  But should Italy fall off the wagon and revert to its old ways, the EU will have a difficult choice.  Do you punish bad behavior?  Or do you recognize that Italy, like Spain, is too big to be allowed to fail?

So long as Italy more or less toes the austerity line, I don’t see any major confrontations with the EU. But if Italy’s political parties start the siren song of populism or—worse—if a non-credible leader like Silvio Berlusconi wins the premiership again, I would expect a showdown.

At that point, it becomes a question of who blinks first.

If you liked this article, consider getting Sizemore Insights via E-mail.

Related posts:

Comparing Dividend ETFs

By The Sizemore Letter

I like ETFs as an investment vehicle.  And I love dividends as a source of investment return.

So, one might draw the conclusion that I was favorably disposed towards dividend ETFs, and indeed I am (see “Dividend ETFs for Growth and Income”).

Today, I’m going to take a look at one relatively new entrant in what has become a bit of a crowded fields: the iShares High Dividend Equity Fund ($HDV), which tracks the Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index.

To meet Morningstar’s criteria for index membership, companies must have a Morningstar Economic Moat rating of narrow or wide and have a Morningstar Distance to Default score in the top 50% of eligible dividend-paying companies.  The index is then composed of the top 75 companies by dividend yield that meet these criteria.

This requires a little explaining.  Warren Buffett has spoken often of preferring companies with economic “moats” around them that make a challenge from a would-be competitor a challenge.  Coca-Cola’s ($KO) unmistakable brand would be a good example, as would Microsoft’s ($MSFT) domination of the personal computer platform through its Windows operating system and Office productivity software. Not even mighty Apple ($AAPL) has been able to scale Microsoft’s moats in its core areas of expertise.

Morningstar has built upon this “moat” concept, defining it as “the sustainability of a company’s future economic profits.”  In order to earn a narrow or wide moat rating, a company must have “the prospect of earning above average returns on capital, and some competitive edge that prevents these returns from quickly eroding.” Obviously, there is a degree of subjectivity involved, as this is not a numeric value that can be found in a stock screener.  And to be sure, not all moats prove to be unassailable (consider that Research in Motion’s ($RIMM) enterprise email and messaging ecosystem might have been considered a moat just a few years ago). 

Morningstar’s Distance to Default Score is more quantitative yet also a little more esoteric.  It uses option pricing theory to evaluate the risk of a company becoming insolvent. 

While I like Morningstar’s focus on moats, I’m a little more skeptical on its distance to default metric.  Yes, the metric would probably do a decent job most of the time of preventing you from buying a high-yielding stock that was on the verge of slashing its dividend en route to going bust.  Yet option pricing theory would have done little to foresee an event like the 2008 meltdown until it was far too late, and it certainly didn’t prevent Long-Term Capital Management from blowing up a decade before.

HDV is a sibling to the older and better-known iShares Dow Jones Select Dividend ETF ($DVY), which I highlighted in the article I referenced above and which I use in my Covestor Strategic Growth Allocation.  DVY is the granddaddy of all dividend ETFs, and tends to be heavily weighted towards utilities (currently 31% of the ETF) and consumer staples (16%).

HDV holds a much smaller allocation to utilities (just 14%), but has large allocations to health care (29%) and consumer staples (24%).

According to iShares, both ETFs currently yield 3.6%, and both have expense ratios of 0.4%.  Over time, I would expect DVY to sport a higher current yield, though I would expect HDV to offer better potential for capital gains.  In the short-to-medium term, the decision of one over the other is essentially a matter of sector preference.

For longer-term capital gains, my preference remains the Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF ($VIG).  Though it currently yields no more than the broader S&P 500, the ETF is comprised of companies that have raised their dividends every year for the past 10 years.  And while there is no guarantee that they will continue to raise their dividends going forward, the 10-year criteria ensures that you own a portfolio of some of the highest-quality growth companies in the world.  The dividend criteria is also more objective than Morningstar’s moat rating, which depends on the judgment of Morningstar’s analysts.

With that said, any of the ETFs mentioned in this article could be considered as long-term holdings for investor portfolios.  But investors willing to do a little research on their own should eschew buying the ETFs and should instead use their holdings as a convenient stock screener.  Pick and choose the companies you like best from each.  Coca-Cola—which happens to be one of Warren Buffett’s all-time favorites—happens to be a holding of all three ETFs.

Disclosures: DVY, MSFT and VIG are held by Sizemore Capital clients. This article first appeared on MarketWatch.

If you liked this article, consider getting Sizemore Insights via E-mail. 

Related posts:

The Only Investing Strategy You’ll Ever Need

Article by Investment U

“Yeah, but what if…?”

That’s the question everyone is asking me these days. What if Europe collapses? What if Obama is re-elected? What if he isn’t? What if all the money that the Fed is printing leads to hyperinflation? What if interest rates stay low for years? The list goes on and on…

In today’s 24-hour news cycle, people have a hard time believing that each event won’t have a lasting impact on the world and our future.

Whenever I’m asked those questions, I want to emulate the campers in the Bill Murray classic Meatballs and start chanting, “It just doesn’t matter.”

Instead, my response to those fearful questions is, “So you’re saying it’s different this time?” And to my surprise, often the answer is, “Yes.”

Maybe it is different this time. But I doubt it. Sure, our problems are serious and need to be addressed, but the world and the United States have always had problems and crises that were either dealt with or weren’t and the world kept spinning on its axis and the market kept going up. The Great Depression, World War II, The Kennedy Assassination, Watergate and 9/11 were all game changers in the United States in one way or another. Yet, the market kept doing what it has always done – go up over the years.

In fact, if you’re invested for the long term, particularly if your money is in stocks that raise the dividend every year (Perpetual Dividend Raisers), you shouldn’t let any of today’s issues, that have politicians (and newsletter writers) breathlessly ranting, impact your investing decisions.

You see in the last 74 years, there have only been seven instances where the market did not go up over 10 years. A 91% win rate. The market has never been down over 20 years. All seven down periods were tied to the Great Depression or Great Recession. And keep in mind that not all years attached to those periods were down. For example, 2000-2010, which included two nasty bear markets, was actually up for the 10 years when you include dividends.

Including the down years of the Great Depression and Recession, stocks on average more than double every 10 years. Dividend Aristocrats – stocks that have raised their dividends for 25 years in a row – nearly triple on average.

But the way to make real money in the markets isn’t to just blindly buy and hold. You still need to be in the right stocks. And investing in Perpetual Dividend Raisers – companies with a track record of annual dividend raises – are the right stocks.

It’s a conservative strategy that hits homeruns. You don’t need to speculate on penny stocks to make great returns in the market.

For example, 10 years ago, if you bought boring Procter & Gamble (NYSE: PG) and reinvested your dividends, you more than doubled your money. Exxon Mobil (NYSE: XOM) generated a return of 169%.

And if you had put $10,000 into McDonald’s (NYSE: MCD) 10 years ago, your investment would have turned into $48,086.

This, during a period when the S&P 500 returned 30% (including dividends) over a 10-year period.

And for investors who need income today, investing in Perpetual Dividend Raisers is about the only way to stay ahead of inflation. Munis and Treasuries sure won’t. Their yields are already below the current low inflation rate. And if inflation picks up over the years, investors in those securities will be left in the dust with significantly diminished buying power. Finding the right Perpetual Dividend Raisers assures you of an increase of 8% to 10% in your annual dividend income.

In my new book, Get Rich with Dividends: A Proven System for Earning Double Digit Returns, I walk investors through my easy to understand and simple to use 10-11-12 System, which is designed to generate 11% yields and 12% average annual returns by investing in Perpetual Dividend Raisers. I show you what parameters to look for, how to ensure your dividend is safe, how to turbocharge your returns and why the system works.

For more information, including a 35% discount, click here.

If you’re an investor trying to build a nest egg for retirement, generate income in retirement, save for a college education, or any other long-term goal, this is the only investing strategy you’ll ever need.

It’s simple, inexpensive and most of all it has been proven to work throughout the decades – regardless of all the “what ifs?”

Good Investing,

Marc

Article by Investment U