Market Review 14.6.12

Source: ForexYard

printprofile

The euro saw moderate gains in overnight trading, but remained low as investors continue to worry about the outcome of Greek elections scheduled for Sunday. Crude oil reversed its gains from yesterday and is currently trading around $82.55 a barrel. Gold continues to move up, as investors now view it as a safe-haven asset. The precious metal is currently trading at $1618.15 an ounce.

Main News for Today

Italian Bond Auction
• Investors will be closely watching the auction to see if the euro-zone debt crisis has spread beyond Spain and Greece
• Poor demand for Italian bonds could cause the euro to fall during afternoon trading

US Core CPI-12:30 GMT
• The USD fell against the yen during trading yesterday after several US indicators came in below their expected levels
• The same trend could occur today if the Core CPI comes in below the expected 0.2%

US Unemployment Claims-12:30 GMT
• Forecasted to come in at 377K
• Anything above the forecasted level could cause the USD to take losses during afternoon trading

Read more forex news on our forex blog

Forex Market Analysis provided by ForexYard.

© 2006 by FxYard Ltd

Disclaimer: Trading Foreign Exchange carries a high level of risk and may not be suitable for all investors. There is a possibility that you could sustain a loss of all of your investment and therefore you should not invest money that you cannot afford to lose. You should be aware of all the risks associated with Foreign Exchange trading.

Australian Housing – How to Avoid This Pauper’s Retirement Trap

By MoneyMorning.com.au

Our old pal Warren Buffett knows where the money is.

This week Bloomberg News reported:

‘Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Inc. jumped into the slumping private-jet market again with a record order valued at $9.6 billion, betting on a rebound later this decade with a third plane purchase in less than two years.’

It suggests that Buffett doesn’t think his proposal to tax the rich will have an effect on private-jet travel.


The timing of the deal was appropriate, because it came at the same time as a report from the US Federal Reserve that showed US household wealth is back to 1992 levels. According to the San Francisco Chronicle:

‘Median net worth declined to $77,300 in 2010, the lowest since 1992, from $126,400 in 2007, the Fed said in its Survey of Consumer Finances…Almost every demographic group experienced losses, which may hurt retirement prospects for middle-income families, Fed economists said in the report.’

Worse, after taking a big hit from falling house prices and stock markets, most investors would like to get some of those losses back. Many were too scared to get back into the stock market, and will have missed the US market’s doubling rally.

They went for the safer option of cash, which in the US returns barely more than zero percent.

Australian Housing and Retirement

Aussie investors and future retirees haven’t done much better. And if they’re not careful, as we’ll explain today, they could end up doing a whole lot worse…

In the Daily Reckoning yesterday, our old pal Dan Denning told readers about a news scoop in the Australian newspaper.

The article notes:

‘Subprime-style lending practices were rampant during the last property boom despite claims by lenders that local practices were superior to global standards.’

The author – Anthony Klan – reveals:

‘Fitch Ratings estimates low-doc and no-doc loans now represent 8-10 per cent of the $1.2 trillion national mortgage market. That’s between $96bn and $120bn.’

We were stunned when we saw those figures. We always knew the Australian housing market had a potential subprime ticking time bomb, but how could we prove it?

The suits at the Reserve Bank of Australia and their puppets in the mainstream press insisted Aussie banking standards were far better than those overseas, and that subprime lending was only a small part of the Aussie mortgage market.

As RBA deputy governor Guy Debelle said in a speech in 2008:

‘Non-conforming loans in Australia accounted for only about 1 per cent of outstanding loans in 2007, well below the 13 per cent sub-prime share in the US. The share of new loans in Australia that are non-conforming has also been very low over recent years, at about 1 to 2 per cent, significantly below the 20 per cent sub-prime share that loans reached in the US in 2006.’

The deputy governor even provided a chart to prove it, as you can see below. However, we’ve taken the liberty of adding the real level of sub-prime lending as revealed by the Australian:

size of sub-prime housing markets

That’s right, according to the Australian, there are eight to ten times more Aussie sub-prime loans than most previously believed.

In fact, if the Australian and Fitch Ratings are right, Aussie sub-prime lending was or is only slightly lower than US sub-prime lending levels.

So rather than the banks being more prudent with borrowing standards, they were knee deep in dodgy loan applications.

And arguably the only reason Aussie sub-prime lending didn’t reach US levels is because the Aussie banks joined in later and had some catching up to do.

So it seems the outlook for the Aussie housing market is even worse than we thought…and we thought it was pretty bad. Even a higher home-buyers bribe in New South Wales won’t stop the slow collapse of house prices.

But, that’s not the worst of it. There’s an even bigger problem, which could send hundreds of thousands of Aussie retirees to the poorhouse…

Avoid the Housing Trap

As you get older, you’ll probably realise you don’t really need a three or four bedroom house, with three lounge rooms, a big kitchen and two, three or four toilets.

The kids have moved out, and you just don’t need the space. So what do you do? You sell the house, unlock the equity and then buy something smaller.

Trouble is the relationship between house prices and house sizes isn’t linear. By that we mean a four bedroom house isn’t twice the price of a two bedroom house in the same area.

And a two-bedroom unit isn’t twice the price of a one-bedroom unit.

In other words, when it comes to downsizing you may end up paying more on a per-square-metre basis. But still, at least you get to pocket the cash difference.

But not everyone wants to move. And besides, when you take into account the cost of selling, moving and buying a new place, it soon eats into a big chunk of the proceeds anyway.

That’s why a popular choice for retirees has been reverse mortgages.

In short, a reverse mortgage lets you take out a loan using your mortgage-free home as collateral.

The idea is you can stay in your home after retirement, while still unlocking the equity. You can typically ‘withdraw’ 15-40% of the value of your home. For example, if your home is valued at $400,000 you could borrow up to $160,000.

Sounds fine, right?

Except for one problem: the power of compounding…

How Compounding Works Against You

Compounding is great when you’re saving money. You earn interest on your savings and when you receive the interest you earn interest on the interest.

But when you’re borrowing money with no plans to pay back the loan or the interest, then compounding works against you…and fast.

Let’s say you’re a 65-year-old male and you own a $400,000 house. According to the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia, a single male needs $21,946 per year for a modest lifestyle.

So, you could take out a lump sum reverse mortgage of $22,000 and then receive monthly payments of $1,833. Again, that sounds fine. But here’s the bad news…

Because compounding works against you, you’ll never receive the full $400,000 value of your home. In fact, if you’re after a modest lifestyle of $21,946 per year, the monthly repayments you receive will only last six years. Not great for a 65-year-old male who, on average, should live to 79.

And what if you outlive the average? According to the Smart Money website, 50% of men aged 60 today will live to 84. And 10% will live to 95.

That’s a whole lot of living left after offloading your home for what is in effect just a fraction of the market value.

So what’s the alternative?

Plan Now Before It’s Too Late

Obviously the best alternative is to plan well in advance, so you don’t have to mortgage yourself in retirement. If you can plan far enough in advance you should be lucky enough to stay in the family home and still have a comfortable lifestyle.

Another idea is to downsize without selling up.

That is, rent somewhere smaller while you rent out the family home to someone else. You won’t make a packet after deducting agent fees and maintenance costs, but you should at least cover the rent for your smaller place while still leaving some cash left over.

That means you won’t have to dip into your other savings so much. Plus you’ve still got the house to sell at a later date if you need to.

Your final option is to sell up, downsize and move to a cheaper suburb. That can be a tough decision if you’re used to living in a certain area. But it’s not so bad…how about getting out of the city and into a nice place in the country?

But, what about falling house prices? Won’t that have an impact on what will happen in retirement?

In a way, yes. That’s why it’s important that you don’t use property and your home as your sole means of funding retirement. On the other hand, remember that if one group of houses fall in price, others will likely fall too.

So while you may get less for the family home, odds are the smaller house you buy will be cheaper too.

The bottom line is, it’s never too late (or too early) to start planning for retirement. If you think it’s OK to blow all your savings because you can just sell your house in retirement and live off the proceeds, think again. It’s not that simple.

Planning for retirement takes more effort than that. It means working out now how much you need in growth assets, how much you need in income assets and how much you need in protection assets.

It’s a strategy we’ve laid out many times over the past year or so.

For a refresher on how to allocate your money so you won’t face a pauper’s retirement, click here…

Cheers,
Kris.

Related Articles

Market Pullback Exposes Five Stocks to Buy

Best Investment Strategies For the Times Ahead

Why Reverse Compounding is the Road to Rags… Not Riches


Australian Housing – How to Avoid This Pauper’s Retirement Trap

Everything You Need to Know About Junior Mining Stocks

By MoneyMorning.com.au

Let’s make something clear up front: junior mining stocks are not for the faint of heart.

Legendary investor Doug Casey calls them “the most volatile stocks on earth.”

They can and do regularly undergo massive swings, both positive and negative.

It’s a really tough business. Many flame out.

But all it takes is just one 10-bagger to make up for all the dogs in the pound.

Thanks to a new discovery, a takeover bid or full-blown investment mania, it’s not uncommon for some of these stocks to return as much as 1,000%, 5,000%, and even 10,000%.

Those are not typos. In fact, there are countless examples.

Aber Resources was a $3 stock in 1993 before it made a big diamond discovery. Four years later, the stock hit $28/share, handing early investors over 900% returns.

Then there’s Diamond Fields Resources. Its shares were $4 before geologists made a massive nickel discovery in 1994. Not long after, the stock hit a pre-split equivalent of $160 for a 4,000% return.

That phenomenal 4,000% return was repeated in 2006, when Aurelian Resources Inc. made a high-grade gold discovery in Ecuador. Shares of the junior miner went from $0.89 to almost $40.

So what makes a stock a “junior miner”?

In a pure sense, junior mining companies have market caps somewhere between $5 million and $100 million.

But here’s the thing the makes them not for the faint of heart.

Usually, junior miners don’t make any money. They just raise money from investors to explore properties for gold, silver, base metals, oil, gas, potash, or uranium, just to name a few.

And even if they make a significant find, junior miners rarely develop it themselves. Instead they sell the project to a major miner, who can more easily raise the required funding and has the experience to build and operate a mine.

OK, so now you’re pumped with the idea that one of these little mining companies could help you retire in two years.

And you’re right, they can. But not so fast.

The truth is you need to approach this mining subsector with a game plan – an investment “toolkit” if you will – to help you to cast aside the dogs and focus on the “diamonds in the rough.”

Essentially, there are four main areas you need to vet in order to decide if a given junior miner is one to add to your portfolio.

Junior Mining Stocks and Geopolitics

When considering a junior miner, geopolitics is always a concern. In this case, stability is what you are looking for.

For instance, it is important to know:

Where the company’s main project is located.

And what the political regime is like in that jurisdiction.

I make no bones about avoiding projects located in places unfriendly to mining, and neither should you.

That includes most of Africa, Russia, and some areas in Asia and Latin America. Places favourable for miners include much of Canada, Australia, parts of Europe and Scandinavia, Latin America, and Asia.

It’s simple. The last thing you want is for some kleptocrat to wait until tens of millions have been spent to discover a massive gold deposit, only to turn around and revoke a key permit or expropriate the land.

What also tends to happen in these “hostile-to-mining” locations is that, after a project is built, the government decides to change the rules, ask for a significant share, and/or up the royalties.

For the most part, the places I like for mining have an established legal framework that allows the miner to know the rules and doesn’t make drastic changes too often.

The second aspect of geopolitics is the surroundings and placement of the property. Many times there can be people living nearby, or the land may have significance to an indigenous population.

Some projects also need to get entire small towns to move, while others need to negotiate with a native group for some sort of compensation.

To avoid these hurdles, a Stakeholder Engagement Program is a great way for the company to gain favor with the locals.

By involving the local community through sponsorships and hiring, and by working with educational institutions for consulting or research, the company can demonstrate how they are able and willing to contribute to the economic benefit of the area.

Obviously, a deposit in the middle of nowhere is less likely to affect people. But that could also mean there is little or no infrastructure like electricity, water, or roads nearby.

Generally, the closer the access to these, the better, as it allows access to the property, facilitates exploration and development, and simplifies eventual mine operation.

The Importance of Management for Junior Mining Stocks

When it comes to junior mining stocks, management is the key.

It is so important that many times a less-than-stellar property can be made viable simply by a great management team that has the ability to prove its deposits are economically attractive, or even potentially very profitable.

Investors need to be sure the guys running the junior miner have a ton of experience, ideally directly related to the same commodity involved in the project at hand.

Even better is when management and/or the company’s geologists have made significant discoveries in the past, and some of those deposits have made it all the way to becoming mines.

Experienced management will also know how to navigate the legal, political, and financial issues sure to arise.

Look for companies where the key people have plenty of “skin in the game,” ensuring their shares and stock options align their interests with those of shareholders.

Don’t Overlook the Balance Sheet of a Junior Mining Company

Balance sheets can be intimidating for some investors, but they don’t need to be. Here are a few things you want to look for.

First, determine the market cap of the company and the number of outstanding shares.

If the share float looks excessively big, it could be that management raised money at really low equity prices when they were desperate. It could be a question of bad luck or timing, or it could be bad planning. You need to figure out which.

Second, you don’t want a junior miner that has debt, or at least significant debt on its balance sheet, if it has no cash flow. As well, their cash balance should be able to take them through to their next significant milestone.

If that’s the case, and the news pointing towards that milestone is positive, it may allow management to raise money at a significantly higher share price, avoiding overly diluting existing shareholders.

Also, take a look at their monthly costs to keep the lights on, employees paid, and exploration moving forward.

In certain cases, a junior may actually earn income from an ongoing related business. I’ve come across one company with significant earnings from mine remediation, which actually helped them gain invaluable information on interesting properties they eventually picked up. Another, a small silver miner, manufactures, sells, and repairs mining equipment for competitors, helping to pay the bills.

Junior Mining Drilling Results are Paramount

An important ingredient that helps separate the wheat from the chaff is the drilling results.

It’s one thing to drill a hole and hit gold. It’s quite another to know where to keep drilling, and to keep finding more.

The best junior miners are the ones that use a process, involving plenty of science, geology, geophysics, and yes, some art.

All the scientific aspects help geologists know where to look. But it’s decades of experience that allow some geologists to interpret the drill results and assays. Only then can they use that info to formulate a concept of what the deposit may actually look like.

Prospective investors will want to look for high grade (concentration) of the resource for every ton of ore. Typically, the higher the concentration, the higher the value, as eventual mining and processing costs will be lower per gram or per pound of final product.

In that vein, investors want to see higher grade, and drill results that consistently hit quality material.

That tells you two things: the geologist is looking in the right place, and the deposit is likely growing in size. This in turn helps boost the value of the asset, while allowing for a more economic extraction of the contained resource in the future.

So there you have it. Now you know what things to look for to significantly increase your odds of investing in a junior resource company that’s going to hit the jackpot.

Remember, even doing all this provides no guarantees.

You need to do plenty of due diligence to narrow down the vast pool of potential candidates to the select few deserving of your hard-earned capital.

You also need to arm yourself with patience and be willing to allow a given investment months and even years to play itself out. Good management needs time to execute, and resource exploration is a tough business.

But there are few other industries where $1 spent drilling in the right place can return $100 dollars to early investors.

Junior miners offer that explosive potential.

Now you just need to decide… do you want a piece of it?

Peter Krauth
Contributing Editor, Money Morning

Publisher’s Note: This article originally appeared in Money Morning USA

From the Archives…

Why You Should Wish For a Falling Market
2012-06-08 – Greg Canavan

Why the U.S. Dollar is Really Rising
2012-06-07 – Keith Fitz-Gerald

How This Bear Market Could Last Another 18 Years… Just Like Japan’s
2012-06-06 – Kris Sayce

The Banking Plan That Could Be A Game-Changer for Gold
2012-06-05 – Dr. Alex Cowie

Best Investment Strategies For the Times Ahead
2012-06-04 – Nick Hubble


Everything You Need to Know About Junior Mining Stocks

Large Cap Value Stocks: A Great Big Value?

Article by Investment U

Large Cap Value Stocks: A Great Big Value?

Even investors with little appetite for stocks should be looking at one dirt-cheap sector: large-cap value.

More than a few investors are feeling a little gun-shy right now. Weak economic indicators – including soft employment and low consumer confidence – and ongoing problems in the Eurozone have put many on the defensive.

That’s not necessarily a bad thing. When the market starts to wobble, there is often more downside ahead.

But there’s a big difference between investing defensively and not investing at all. Successful investing is about managing risk – not running from it.

That’s why even investors with little appetite for stocks should be looking at one dirt-cheap sector: large-cap value.

Brandes Institute recently sliced U.S. stocks into 10 deciles by value characteristics and found that value hasn’t just done better. From 1980 to 2010, the cheapest stocks outperformed the most expensive by 575%.

Why does this happen? As a former money manager, I know that investing in value requires patience. That’s something most retail investors – and many small institutions – simply don’t have. They’ll hold a stock or a stock fund a couple quarters and if nothing is happening – especially if growth stocks are doing well – they’ll grouse that they’re sitting on “dead money” and roll into something else, often at precisely the wrong time.

The great global value investor John Templeton used to hold his stock positions an average of seven and a half years. Yet many investors would describe this approach as “From Here to Eternity.”

That’s why value investing is often referred to as “time arbitrage.” It often takes several months (or years) for value investing to work its magic.

Yet now is likely an excellent time to get started. Credit Suisse data reveals that the cheapest stocks in the S&P 500 index based on five metrics, including the price-to-earnings and price-to-sales ratios, have lagged the most expensive ones by 9% this year. And, according to Russell Investment, the last time a value index ranked on top and a growth index on bottom was the disastrous year of 2008.

Every seasoned investor knows that various asset classes go through cycles of outperformance and underperformance. Value has lagged for a very long time – and now offers plenty of upside potential without the neck-snapping volatility of go-go growth stocks.

How to play it? You can research and buy individual value stocks. Or you can take the simple, diversified approach and just buy a fund or ETF. If you prefer the latter route, a good candidate is the Vanguard Value ETF (NYSE: VTV).

VTV tracks the performance of a large-cap, value benchmark: the MSCI US Prime Market Value Index. The fund remains fully invested and uses a passive management strategy (no active trading), so it is relatively tax efficient. The expense ratio here is the lowest in the industry – just 0.12%. And the fund’s 10 largest holdings – which make up almost a third of the portfolio – are companies you know well: Exxon Mobil (NYSE: XOM), Chevron (NYSE: CVX), General Electric (NYSE: GE), AT&T (NYSE: T), Procter & Gamble (NYSE: PG), Johnson & Johnson (NYSE: JNJ), JP Morgan Chase (NYSE: JPM), Pfizer (NYSE: PFE), Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC) and Intel (Nasdaq: INTC).

In short, the recent sell-off has made value stocks a bargain right now. It’s a great opportunity… if you have the patience for it.

Good Investing,

Alexander Green

Article by Investment U

How to Profit From Bristol-Myers Squibb’s New Cancer Drugs

Article by Investment U

View the Investment U Video Archive

In focus this week – Bristol-Myers Squibb Company’s (NYSE: BMY) new powerhouse cancer drugs, junk bonds now and the SITFA.

Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (NYSE: BMY)…

How to Profit From Bristol-Myers Squibb's New Cancer Drugs

There are changes coming in the medical world that will be as revolutionary and life changing as anesthesia was in the mid 19th century.

There are changes coming in the medical world that will be as revolutionary and life changing as anesthesia was in the mid 19th century.

Bristol-Myers Squibb announced this week that not one but two of its experimental immunotherapy drugs, not chemotherapy drugs, immunotherapy, have shown amazing results in advanced stages of several types of cancer, and the results are long lasting.

These drugs are turning life expectancies from months to years!

Immunotherapies are a whole new way of treating cancer, and other diseases, by getting the own immune systems to recognize a cancer cell as a foreign body and fighting it. Until now cancer cells have been able to stop our immune systems from responding to them as a threat. That gave cancer carte blanche access to our bodies.

Dr Suzanne Topalian of Johns Hopkins said that these immunotherapy drugs are not like any other drug treatment. Your immune system has a memory so these treatments should work for life just like the vaccinations we received as children.

The market for this type of treatment is so huge there aren’t even any estimates yet on how much this could mean to BMY’s bottom line. This could transform the medical industry.

Other companies that have similar immunotherapy trials in place are; Roche (OTC: RHHBY), Glaxo Smith Kline (NYSE: GSK) and Merck (NYSE: MRK).

Put this one on your back burner and watch for news about BMY’s phase three trial that is to begin this December. Remember, buy on the rumor, sell on the news, but in this case as the news begins to leak before the end of the trials – as it always does – it may be best to keep this one for the long run.

Junk Bonds Now?

William Larkin of Cabot Money Management said in the Journal this week that if you need yield, and who doesn’t, you need high yield, but you have to be comfortable with some volatility. These are not CD’s.

On the plus side of junk bonds, despite a very slow economy, high yield default rates are well below long term averages. The Journal reports the default rate at 3% for the past year and Moody’s expects it to drop to 2.8% next year. That means 97% of all high yield bonds are paying exactly as promised!

Fears of Spanish bank problems and the continuing Greek problems have caused a recent sell off in corporate bonds which according to Jamie Farnham, managing director of credit research at TCW, it’s a buying opportunity.

Farnham said in a Wall Street Journal article that high yields, like all investments, have swings between panic and euphoria but long term high yield looks very good.

The slow growth rate of the U.S. economy of 1.9% is worrisome for stock investors but according to BNP Paribas’s Martin Fridson 1.9% is plenty for companies to cover their interest payments so high yields are in very good shape in this environment.

Payout levels of 5% to 7% are being quoted in Barrons’ and the WSJ but if you follow my articles in the Ultimate Income Letter or here at Investment U you know there are opportunities out there as high as the mid-teens, you just need to know where to look.

For the informed, high-yield bonds are a great way to earn much more than stock market returns with a lot fewer headaches and a lot less volatility.

And last, the SITFA

This week it goes to the CEO’s out there who think losing a billion or so dollars of their share holders money is just part of doing business.

A recent WSJ article recommended the Slurpee Rule be enforced for any CEO who loses a billion or more dollars.

What’s the Slurpee rule? The Slurpee Rule says any CEO who loses a billion or more should be fired immediately. No severance package, no stock options, nothing, just get out, and be made to work at 7-Eleven cleaning the Slurpee machines.

The WSJ writer thinks this should give the fallen CEO’s a renewed perspective on how hard it is to earn a billion dollars.

I have to agree…

Article by Investment U

How to Play the Apple TV Revolution with Options

Article by Investment U

How to Play the Apple TV Revolution with Options

The new Apple TV will provide yet another reason for Apple (AAPL) stock to take off. You can play with trend for cheap with options using a bull call spread.

It wasn’t said outright, but Piper Jaffray analyst Gene Munster thinks Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL) CEO Tim Cook was sounding the alarm. Munster and many industry pundits and bloggers have been looking at Cook’s comments from the All Things Digital Conference late last month with great interest.

“The message that I think Tim Cook intended to send was don’t buy a TV, we’re working on something,” Munster says. Munster has been snooping around other avenues and he’s pretty sure we’ll see a new Apple TV relatively soon. What he’s not exactly sure of is the “when.”

“They could announce a new Apple TV as soon as December,” he says.

In the past, Munster has said the new Apple TV – or iTV – will be “the biggest thing in consumer electronics since the smartphone came up.”

Where There’s Smoke, There’s Fire…

Here are three other sources on the manufacturing side that point to a new iTV coming soon:

  • China Business News reports that Foxconn, Apple’s Chinese manufacturing partner, has already started a pilot production of the new Apple HDTV. They say their sources tell them that a Foxconn factory in Shenzhen has received orders for an Apple “smart TV” and is producing them on a trial basis.
  • Another Chinese publication, WantChinaTimes, quotes Lao Cha, an industry observer, who said, “The advent of the mobile internet has paved the way for digital convergence, prompting Apple, Samsung and other international brands to branch out into smart TVs. Smart TVs play a critical role in digital convergence. Cloud computing and equipment linkage will be key to the success of equipment suppliers.”
  • According to Canaccord Genuity analyst Michael Walkley in a note to clients, “Following our supply chain checks, we have increased confidence Apple will launch a 50-plus inch LCD-TV product by [the first fiscal quarter of 2013].”

Much Ado About Content

Many analysts are hung up on the idea that Apple won’t release a television if it can’t do something special with content. Munster thinks this is wrong. Apple television will take off not because it will conquer cable television, but because of the interface that it will give its users.

There’s a growing desire by users to have unbundled content. But we all know that the Comcasts (Nasdaq: CMCSA) of the world aren’t going to let that happen anytime soon. So Apple will need to improvise for the time being. Here’s the rest of Munster’s take on what Apple can do with content:

  • Consumers are willing to pay more for each channel as long as their overall bill goes down (i.e. pay more for fewer channels you actually want). Apple has shown a knack for disrupting industries and will likely try the same here.
  • Unbundled channels and DVR will eventually be in the cloud. However this will take a few years. In the near term it will probably strongly resemble the current Apple TV content offering of streaming options.
  • The interface should allow users a new way to search, interact and record cable content.

Munster thinks it will be released in the first half of 2013, and he believes the prices will be $1,500 to $2,000, and screen sizes will be 42″ to 55″.

How to Play

In my eyes this will provide yet another reason for Apple stock to take off.

A few weeks ago, I wrote about how to play Apple stock for less with options. I suggested using a bull call spread (vertical call spread) where you buy call options at a specific strike price while also selling the same number of calls of the same asset and expiration date but at a higher strike.

If you agree that Apple is poised for a boost with a TV offer in the next six months to a year, you may want to look into this approach… Here’s a closer look at how it works:

A bull call spread is used when you believe a security is going up. The most you can gain is the difference between the strike prices of the long and short options, less the net cost of options. Here’s that example again.

In the March 26 issue of Barron’s, Striking Price columnist Steven M. Sears gives a pretty good example of how this works:

“With Apple at $601.31, investors can buy Apple’s January $600 call that expires in 2013, and sell Apple’s January $700 call that also expires in 2013. The position costs $37.50, and lets investors benefit if Apple’s stock hits $700 by next January.

“If Apple’s stock advances as expected, investors who used the Apple call-spread strategy-buying the January $600 call and selling the January $700 call will make a 168% return on their investment.”

Of course you get limited return if the stock goes above $700 because you don’t own it. But keep in mind that one of the great things about this spread trade is that the expense you incur by purchasing the at-the-money call option is offset by the income you receive from writing the out-of-the-money call option – and this is why your net expense for the trade is much smaller.

And for those who aren’t comfortable with options, consider a small semi-conductor company as play on iPhones and iPads – Cirrus Logic (Nasdaq: CRUS).

Cirrus Logic is the sole supplier for audio codecs in iDevices (iPhones and iPads). It derives 50% of its revenue from Apple. I’ll keep you posted as I hear more…

Good Investing,

Jason Jenkins

Article by Investment U

RBNZ keeps benchmark rate at 2.5%

By Central Bank News
    The Reserve Bank of New Zealand kept its benchmark Official Cash Rate (OCR) unchanged at 2.5 percent, as expected.

    The central bank of New Zealand said the outlook for the country’s trading partners had worsened and it was monitoring the developments in the euro area carefully. Higher agricultural production and the weaker global economic outlook had driven down New Zealand’s export commodity prices, which would weigh on the country’s growth in the future.
    “Offsetting these negative influences, housing market activity continues to increase, supported by recent reductions in mortgage interest rates,” the bank said, quoting Governor Alan Bollard.
    “In addition, repairs and reconstruction in Canterbury are expected to substantially boost construction sector activity in coming quarters. Aggregate GDP growth is projected to pick up slightly to just over 3 percent next year. Given this economic outlook, inflation is expected to settle near the mid-point of the target range.
    “It remains appropriate for monetary policy to remain stimulatory, with the OCR being held at 2.5 percent,” the bank said.

    www.CentralBankNews.info
    
    


FSB:progress in making executive pay aligned with risk

By Central Bank News
    Countries with major financial institutions are making gradual progress toward ensuring that compensation for top executives reflects the real risks that the firms are taking on, the Financial Stability Board said in a progress report.


    The FSB, which groups authorities in charge of financial stability in 24 countries, said those countries — Argentina, India, Indonesia, Russia and South Africa — that in 2011 showed significant gaps in implementing the FSB’s Principles and Standards (P&S) for Sound Compensation Practices had now made progress in implementing the principles. 
    But in Indonesia and Russia, the FSB said necessary regulation was still under review and had not yet been issued. Argentina, Brazil, China, India and Turkey had decided not to implement some of the FSB’s principles due to domestic limitations, such as labour laws.
    “These jurisdictions will need to continue their efforts to overcome impediments to full implementation in order to ensure an outcome that is fully consistent with the objectives of the P&S,” the FSB said.
    The Group of 20 leading economic powers has made the FSP responsible for monitoring and coordinating reform of the financial sector following the global financial crises that began in 2007. The FSB’s principles were endorsed by the G20 Leaders at their Summits in London in April 2009 and Pittsburgh in September 2009.
    Compensation practices at large financial institutions were a key contributing factor to the global financial crisis. The FSB’s principles were developed to align compensation with prudent risk-taking, particularly at significant financial institutions where executive pay typically was tied to short-term profits but not the longer-term risks.
    For further details, please see the FSB’s full report.


www.CentralBankNews.info
    


What Says the Investing All-Star Team?

By The Sizemore Letter

I’ll let you in on a little secret, dear reader. In those moments when I have doubts, I like to look over the shoulders of great investors to see what they are doing. (Actually, it’s really not much of a secret. It’s a topic I discuss quite openly and frequently. See “When in Doubt, Follow the Greats.”)

Back in grammar school, your teacher might have called it “cheating,” but this isn’t grammar school. It’s the rough-and-tumble real world of investing, and we can all learn a lot from following the trades of great investors.

Every year in January, Barron’s assembles an “all-star team” of sorts to participate in their Roundtable discussion. The 2012 team includes familiar names such as Pimco founder Bill Gross, Gloom, Boom & Doom Report Editor Marc Faber, and Senior Investment Strategist of Goldman Sachs Abby Joseph Cohen.

In the June 9 issue of the magazine, Barron’s checked up on the Roundtable to get their investment outlook in light of the turbulence coming out of Europe (see “Caution: Sharp Turns Ahead.”)

Views among the ten panelists run the gamut, but a couple themes showed up with consistency.

  1. Europe’s sovereign debt crisis continues to be the single biggest threat to both the global economy and the capital markets.
  2. China’s slowdown is also a major concern.
  3. The United States—while healthy by comparison—faces the “fiscal cliff” of tax hikes and spending cuts next year barring a deal between the White House and Congress.

The panelists might as well have added that the sky is blue, as these conclusions will come as a surprise to no one. Still, their recommendations for how to navigate the storm are varied and insightful.

Felix Zulauf, President of Zulauf Asset Management, is the most bearish of the bunch. Zulauf notes that stocks are cheap—adjusted for inflation, Italian stocks trade at “levels last seen in Mussolini’s era”—yet that does not guarantee good returns going forward. Zulauf sees the West more or less caving in on itself under the weights of its debts.

Abby Joseph Cohen notes that “Individual investors have had the stuffing knocked out of them” in recent years, which explains their skittishness. No one wants to sit through another 2008 meltdown, so investors tend to sell first and ask questions later.

This has created bargains, however. Like Zulauf, Cohen considers stocks to be cheap by historical standards: “Stocks are selling at low price/earnings ratios [and] companies have strong balance sheets.”

Of course, as Cohen notes, this means nothing in the short-term. Stocks can go from cheap to cheaper.

Meryl Witmer, General Partner of Eagle Capital Partners, has the views closest to my own. Says Witmer, “The exodus from the market has created bargains. You have to stay unemotional and analytical and try to find companies that, in the long run, will generate free cash and increase in value. Usually, when stocks get cheap like this, things get better.”

Witmer takes a play out of Warren Buffett’s book, arguing that you should only buy a company “if the market were to close for 10 years, you would still be happy owning that company.”

I will note that when I have made the biggest mistakes in my investing career, it is usually because I failed to take that advice. You don’t have to actually hold the stock for ten years. You should just make sure that everything you own is something you’d be willing to hold for ten years if the market were to close tomorrow. It’s a sound rule of thumb.

Bill Gross’s comments were particularly interesting. For a man known around the world as the “Bond King,” Mr. Gross is not at all bullish on bonds, noting that “Treasuries are overvalued and getting more so.”

Gross sees roughly a decade ahead of slow growth with the economy on central bank monetary “life support.” Yet he is bullish on select emerging market bonds and, interestingly, Sizemore Investment Letter recommendation Siemens ($SI) and French pharmaceutical giant Sanofi ($SNY)—both European companies in the heart of the sovereign debt crisis.

I’ll wrap this up with comments from “Dr. Doom” Marc Faber.

Faber, uncharacteristically, is surprisingly light on the doom and gloom. Though he expects things to get worse before they get better, he believes that “stock markets are oversold” and that “the U.S. bond market is overbought.”

Not surprisingly, Faber likes gold. He’s a long-time gold bug. But rather than recommend investing in a bunker in Idaho, Faber also likes Singapore REITS at current prices, as well as select European blue chips—including Sizemore Investment Letter recommendation Nestle ($NSRGY).

So there you have it. The All Star team is cautious, but they’re not exactly running for the hills either. By and large, they are recommending selective buying on dips, particularly of high-quality, dividend-focused equities.

Sound advice, I would say.

Disclosures: SI and NSRGY are Sizemore Capital holdings.  This article first appeared on MarketWatch.

Gold Jumps Again “But Rangebound Below $1640” as Spanish, Italian Debt Prices Undo €1.1 Trn in Bank Loans

London Gold Market Report
from Adrian Ash
BullionVault
Weds 13 June, 09:05 EST

The WHOLESALE MARKET gold price rose again as New York trading began on Wednesday, extending yesterday’s 1.8% jump to reach $1620 per ounce as new data showed US retail sales falling faster-than-expected in May.

Silver bullion recovered an earlier slip to trade just shy of $29.00 per ounce. The Euro currency held flat but European stock markets slipped with commodity prices.

Spanish borrowing costs rose to new Euro-era highs at 6.73% for 10-year debt, while Italian bond yields also rose to a 6-month record, unwinding the effect of €1.1 trillion in LTRO loans made by the European Central Bank to commercial lenders last winter.

Rome today cut to €6.5 billion the amount of new 1-year debt being sold at auction, but it still had to pay investors 3.97% per year in interest – well over one-point-five percentage points more than at the last time of asking in May.

“If Euro bond yields continue to escalate,” says one gold dealer in Asia, “gold could remain [well] bid.”

Weaker-economy Eurozone bond yields have now reached or breached levels seen before the European Central Bank lent commercial banks €1.1 billion in 3-year loans starting December last year.

The gold price for Euro investors today jumped €41,500 per kilo, a level first reached in mid-August 2011 and approached this week on what analysts variously called “central bank…Chinese [or] Indian…private banking [or] electronic buying.”

“Who knows?” asks one precious metals strategist in a note. “Apparently no one in the market.”

Tuesday was “the 7th consecutive day of alternating between ‘Up’ and ‘Down’ days” in the gold price, notes Russell Browne at market-making bullion bank Scotia Mocatta.

“From a price perspective, the 1559 support is key ahead of 1528 [while] 1640 is the topside trigger for a move higher.”

“Consolidation is ongoing,” agrees Axel Rudolph at Commerzbank in Luxembourg, also saying the gold price “remains essentially range bound within the confines of its major 1532 support zone…and the 1641 current June peak.”

Buying commodities such as gold “at current lows” has “always been profitable” over the last 18 months, said Kevin Norrish, managing director of commodities research at Barclays, speaking in Johannesberg, South Africa today.

“A break below [current levels] would be a major change” to the long-term trend, he said.

After Finnish finance minister Jutta Urpilainen said Helsinki wants collateral for its portion of the €100 billion credit line agreed with the Spanish government to support its banking sector last weekend, “Rumors about backing for the EFSF [Eurozone stability fund] could prove to be bearish news for the gold price,” says a note from Swiss refining and finance group MKS, “as countries may have to use their gold reserves if they run out of other assets to post, should gold be allowed as collateral.”

Over in the United States, says a new presentation from Societe Generale’s Cross Asset Research team, “The prospect of the Fed launching QE3 soon now that the US economy appears to be slowing [means] gold should rally.

“We see scope for the gold price to trade back above $1700 soon, but we are no longer forecasting new all-time highs,” says SocGen, pointing to weak jewelry demand.

“A significant supply surplus” requires what the banks’ analysts call “investors and speculators” to buy almost 2,000 tonnes both in 2012 and 2013 to balance the market.

Meantime in the Eurozone, withdrawals from Greek banking deposits “have seen a marked increase” according to un-named bankers speaking to Reuters.

Daily outflows from ATM cashpoints, investment and Greek bank accounts to other Eurozone member states now total some €500-800 million per day, say the sources.

“Despite the [gold price] push above $1600,” says today’s note from Standard Bank’s commodity analysts, “physical demand remains fairly robust.”

However, the bank adds, the premium over benchmark London prices asked by Shanghai dealers “came off slightly” overnight, indicating a market “that is cautious on gold and unwilling to add long positions.”

World #1 gold consumer India could see its credit status cut to “junk”, said the Standard & Poor’s rating agency Monday, owing to the slow pace of economic reforms and yawning

Taking the Rupee back towards all-time record lows against the US Dollar, “this has resulted in near record prices for gold in Rupee terms,” says Standard Bank, “and a consequent fall-off in physical buying from India.”

Adrian Ash
BullionVault

Gold price chart, no delay   |   Buy gold online at live prices

Adrian Ash is head of research at BullionVault, the secure, low-cost gold and silver market for private investors online, where you can buy gold today vaulted in Zurich on $3 spreads and 0.8% dealing fees.

(c) BullionVault 2012

Please Note: This article is to inform your thinking, not lead it. Only you can decide the best place for your money, and any decision you make will put your money at risk. Information or data included here may have already been overtaken by events – and must be verified elsewhere – should you choose to act on it.