GBP/AUD Bearish Bias Ends Abruptly Above 1.8000

Technical Sentiment: Bearish

Key Takeaways

  • Cable will remain slow until the CPI, Producer Price Index and Retail Price Index releases on Tuesday;
  • 1.8000 is the key level to be watched today and tomorrow.

Last week Cable rallied against the Australian Dollar before price had a chance to touch the 200-Day Simple Average, only to end the rally right on the 1.8000 handle. The technical bias remains bearish below this, yet the landscape could drastically change on a bullish break-out if U.K.’s economic indicators do not disappoint.

 

Technical Analysis

GBPAUD 19th may

GBP/AUD mustered the strength to form a Higher Low last week on the Daily time frame. If this Low at 1.7830 remains intact and the pair continues above 1.8000, traders who are positioned for a deeper downtrend continuation will have an unpleasant surprise in the coming weeks.

No wonder the market has shown a lot of restrain around 1.8000 in the last trading days, as this line appears to be the separation point between bullish and bearish territory. The 50 and 200 Simple Moving Averages are located in this area on the 4H time frame, together with 38.2% Fibonacci Retracement from May’s High of 1.8293 down to last week’s Low of 1.7830 and the resistance trendline for this particular bearish movement.

On the Daily chart Stochastic is exiting oversold territory; consequently a bullish break-out could grind higher for a decent period before the pair enters overbought conditions. The first resistance above 1.8000 is the pivot zone at 1.8047, followed by 61.8% Fibonacci Retracement at 1.8116 and ultimately May’s top at 1.8293.

If by the end of tomorrow GBP/AUD fails to break above 1.8000, then the pair will remain in bearish territory leading to a proper test of the 200-Day Moving Average and possibly even 1.7735.

*********
Prepared by Alexandru Z., Chief Currency Strategist at Capital Trust Markets

 

 

 

 

Thoughts from the Frontline: Special Updates from the Strategic Investment Conference: Day 2

By Worth WrayHello again from the Strategic Investment Conference in San Diego, California!

John Mauldin took the stage on day 2 with a powerful message: while the human brain struggles to anticipate exponential change, our economic future quite literally depends on a race between two accelerating curves – debt and innovation.

Just as exponential growth in government debt starts to destabilize the global economy – with enormous and growing risks to growth and productivity in Japan, the United States, Europe, China, and even many of the emerging markets – John believes the constant doubling of computing power since the late 1950s has brought us to the point where our technological capabilities are taking exponentially larger leaps every year. That constantly accelerating computing power is enabling innovation so profound and disruptive that it looks and feels like magic.

The question John asks is, “Can the private sector innovate and create wealth faster than governments and central banks can destroy it?” We are optimistic that the human race will continue its march forward in the coming decades, but bad policy can stifle innovation and hurt us economically. Ultimately, John’s question will need to be answered on a country-by-country basis… and the distinguished speakers who followed John today gave us a lot of additional food for thought as we contemplate the path ahead.

Former Speaker of the US House of Representatives Newt Gingrich asserted that the pioneers of the future (the dreamers, innovators, and entrepreneurs) will eventually break out past the prison guards of the past (irresponsible and overprotective governments, central bankers, and special interests). Ultimately the rising tide of productivity growth will allow our economic future to transcend past experience, but those gains will be unevenly distributed during the transition – continuing to fuel a political shift from right to left.

We heard a similar view from former President Reagan’s most-quoted living author, George Gilder, who argued that the study of economics must evolve and embrace the lessons of information theory, as he outlined in his 2013 book Knowledge and Power: The Information Theory of Capitalism and How It is Revolutionizing Our World. Mr. Gilder draws a brilliant insight from the way information like phone conversations, emails, and video is transmitted. The electromagnetic spectrum, he argues, is a completely predictable carrier, governed by speed of light. The information it carries, on the other hand, is highly unpredictable. It takes a low-entropy, no-surprises carrier to reliably transmit high-entropy, surprising content. If the carrier itself were to introduce a lot of noise into the signal, our communications would be a jumble.

These ideas from the fields of physics and information theory have extremely important implications for public policy in an age of accelerating technological transformation. In order for innovation to thrive, productivity to surge, and living standards to dramatically rise over the coming decades, we need “low-entropy” legal, regulatory, tax, and monetary policy, and stable institutions to implement it. Too much noisy interference from governments and central banks that distorts market incentives and increases the hassles of doing business can stifle innovation and discourage entrepreneurship. That’s why it is so critical for governments around the world to understand the technological transformation in progress and to actively pursue the reforms their economies will desperately need to participate in the new global economy.

That’s a worrying dynamic if we pay attention to the Heritage Foundation’s Stephen Moore, who harps on the distortions in public policy, or if we consider Hoisington Management’s Dr. Lacy Hunt, who explained to us today that, in aggregate and contrary to popular belief, total debt-to-GDP across the world’s major economies has INCREASED by nearly 35% in the years since 2008. And even more importantly, the new debt has been taken on disproportionately by the real problem economies: Japan, the Eurozone, and China.

With a powerful grasp of an enormous body of academic research (and armed with some hard-hitting discoveries of his own), Dr. Hunt warns that debt deflation – not inflation – is the biggest near-term risk. While inflationists like to chant Milton Friedman’s famous mantra “Inflation is always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon,” Lacy pulled back the curtain on Friedman’s lesser-known research and explained that the famous characterization of inflation ultimately depends on stable or rising monetary velocity… sans sufficient monetary velocity, inflation does not materialize. I really need to think through Dr. Hunt’s research to a greater extent and plan to spend a lot of time reviewing the conference recordings in the coming weeks. (You can do so, too, by ordering the SIC MP3/CD Audio Set at our discounted pre-event price. It’s available here.)

Dylan Grice largely concurred with Dr. Hunt. In his thoughtful outlook for a breakdown in international monetary cooperation, instigated by Japan’s dangerous move toward tit-for-tat central banking, Dylan warned that the world’s central banks are drifting into a dangerous prisoner’s dilemma.

In one of those wonderful moments that happen only at a conference of this quality, Dylan mentioned in conversation later in the day that a Minsky-like inflationary moment can absolutely happen if velocity (rather than interest rates) skyrockets. Paul McCulley had already claimed, in his lunchtime address, that major governments with control over their own printing presses do not have Minsky Moments, but he later had to concede that Dylan could be right in the event of a major policy error.

In the coming weeks, John and I are going to rest up a bit, then revisit the conference, dig into the research, reorganize and expand on our thoughts, and bring you some provocative new ideas.

Once again it is time to hit the send button. Ian Bremmer is walking us through his geopolitical outlook at the moment, and the crowd is hanging on every word. I don’t want to miss it!

Have a great day, and I’ll send you another recap tomorrow.


Worth Wray
Chief Strategist, Mauldin Companies

 

 

Wave Analysis 19.05.2014 (DJIA Index, Crude Oil)

Article By RoboForex.com

Analysis for May 19th, 2014

DJIA Index

It looks like Index is still forming flat pattern inside wave (2). Earlier, price completed bullish wedge pattern inside wave (1). Later instrument is expected to complete correction and start growing up inside the third wave.

More detailed wave structure is shown on H1 chart. Probably, Index is about to finish descending impulse inside wave C of (2). Possibly, price may break minimum of wave A during the day. Later instrument may reverse and start forming initial ascending impulse.

Crude Oil

Chart structure has been changed. Probably, Oil is completing wave 2 with wave [B] in the form of flat pattern inside it. In the future, price may finish impulse inside wave [C] and reverse downwards.

As we can see at the H1 chart, price is forming diagonal triangle pattern inside wave [C]. On minor wave level, Oil is finishing the fifth wave. I opened short-term buy order with target placed on upper border of above-mentioned pattern.

RoboForex Analytical Department

Article By RoboForex.com

Attention!
Forecasts presented in this section only reflect the author’s private opinion and should not be considered as guidance for trading. RoboForex LP bears no responsibility for trading results based on trading recommendations described in these analytical reviews.

 

 

 

 

 

Forex Technical Analysis 19.05.2014 (EUR/USD, GBP/USD, USD/CHF, USD/JPY, AUD/USD, USD/RUB, GOLD)

Article By RoboForex.com

Analysis for May 19th, 2014

EUR USD, “Euro vs US Dollar”

Euro is still forming correctional flag pattern towards previous ascending impulse. We think, today price may continue falling down to reach target of this pattern at level of 1.3680 and then start another ascending structure towards level of 1.3800.

GBP USD, “Great Britain Pound vs US Dollar”

Pound is still moving below level of 1.6825; this movement may be considered as the fifth descending structure to complete current correction with target at level of 1.6655. Later, in our opinion, instrument may form reversal structure to continue moving upwards.

USD CHF, “US Dollar vs Swiss Franc”

Franc is growing up; this movement may be considered as ascending correction towards previous descending impulse. We think, today price may reach level of 0.8935 and then continue falling down to break level of 0.8880 and reach target at level of 0.8820.

USD JPY, “US Dollar vs Japanese Yen”

Yen is still consolidating near level on 101.50. We think, today price may fall down to reach level of 101.00 and then grow up towards level of 102.00. Later, in our opinion, instrument may complete this descending wave by forming another descending structure towards level of 100.00.

AUD USD, “Australian Dollar vs US Dollar”

Australian Dollar is moving inside wide consolidation channel. We think, today price may continue forming this descending structure with target at level of 0.9305. Later, in our opinion, instrument may start another ascending movement to reach level of 0.9415 and then continue falling down.

USD RUB, “US Dollar vs Russian Ruble”

Ruble continues falling down towards level of 34.54. After reaching it, instrument may start growing up to reach level of 35.15 (at least) and then complete this descending wave by forming another descending structure with target at level of 34.50.

XAU USD, “Gold vs US Dollar”

Gold completed correction and right now is moving inside ascending structure with target at level of 1321. After reaching it, price may form consolidation channel and form continuation pattern to continue growing up.

RoboForex Analytical Department

Article By RoboForex.com

Attention!
Forecasts presented in this section only reflect the author’s private opinion and should not be considered as guidance for trading. RoboForex LP bears no responsibility for trading results based on trading recommendations described in these analytical reviews.

 

 

 

 

 

USD/JPY: Inside Bar Breakout Setup In Play

Market Sentiment: Bearish

Key Takeaways:

  • USD/JPY holds off long term trendline support
  • A classic inside bar breakout trade setup emerges on the daily chart
  • Japan’s machinery orders increase unexpectedly

USD/JPY extended upside movement on Monday after closing above the major trendline support last week. The pair is expected to find huge support around the current levels. The sentiment has turned to bearish due to Lower Low (LL) on the daily chart.

Technical Analysis

As of this writing, the pair is being traded near 101.56. A support can be noted around the lower trendline as demonstrated in the following chart. A break and daily closing below the lower trendline channel could push the pair into negative territory, opening doors for a correction below the 100.00 support area.

Chart USDJPY, D1, 2014.05.19 03:08 UTC, Capital Trust Markets, MetaTrader 4, Real
On the upside, the pair is expected to face a hurdle near 102.00, the confluence of 38.2% fib level and psychological number ahead of the upper trendline channel as shown in the above chart. A daily closing above the upper trendline could incite a renewed buying interest, opening doors for 103.32.

Japan Machinery Orders

The machinery orders in Japan increased surprisingly to 16.1% in April as compared to 10.8% in the same month of the year before, up beating the average forecast of just 4.2% increase, a report by the Cabinet Office of Japan revealed today. Generally speaking, higher machinery orders are considered positive for the economy and bearish for USD/JPY.

Trade Ideas

USD/JPY formed a classic inside bar breakout trader setup on Friday. Traders tend to place buy limit and sell stop orders to take advantage from inside bar setups. Considering the recent surprise increase in the Japan’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP), the pair might come under renewed selling pressure threatening the 100.00 handle.

 Prepared by Usman Ahmed, Chief Currency Strategist at Capital Trust Markets

 

 

 

 

Why the Goodman Fielder Share Price Took off Today

By MoneyMorning.com.au

What Happened to the Goodman Fielder Share Price?

Shares of Goodman Fielder Ltd [ASX:GFF] gained 3.8% Monday, closing at its highest level this year.

Why Did this Happen to the GFF Share Price?

The company’s board voted to accept a takeover bid from Singapore’s Wilmar International Ltd and Hong Kong’s First Pacific Co. The takeover bid is at 70 cents, an increase over the 65 cent bid the Goodman Fielder board had previously rejected.

The new bid values the company at $1.37 billion.

What now for Goodman Fielder?

The Wilmar and First Pacific bid appears to be a classic case of investment opportunism. The Goodman Fielder share price took a hammering in early April when the company revealed that earnings would be up to 15% lower than analysts’ expectations.

This news saw the share price sink to a low of 47.5 cents per share, the lowest share price for the company’s shares since mid-2012.

There doesn’t seem to be much chance of the takeover not going through. Two big funds management groups have already indicated that they plan to accept the offer. And with the share price down more than 74% since the top in 2008, it’s unlikely that investors will ignore this opportunity to get out now before things potentially get worse for the share price.

Cheers,
Kris+

Join Money Morning on Google+


By MoneyMorning.com.au

Why the Bradken Share Price Got Belted Today

By MoneyMorning.com.au

What Happened to the Bradken Share Price?

Shares in mining equipment provider Bradken Ltd [ASX:BKN] saw more than 7% of their value wiped out today. At $3.62, Bradken shares are now languishing close to five-year lows.

Why Did this Happen to the BKN Share Price?

This morning the company warned that its earnings for the year ending 30 June 2014 would be significantly lower than it had previously forecasted.

Australia’s mining services companies have endured a tough run in the years since investors started factoring in a cooling resources sector. But today’s announcement from Bradken underlined just how challenging this market is for companies whose fortunes are linked to the booms and busts of mineral wealth.

Bradken has had to cut its costs dramatically to stay viable. Today the company announced a once-off restructuring charge of $51.4 million before tax in the current financial year. Most of that charge relates to redundancy costs…and on the flipside, most of Bradken’s future cost savings will come from having a smaller workforce.

Markets will often give companies the benefit of the doubt when they announce one-off charges like this. But when they’re accompanied by a profit downgrade and a statement that the company foresees no short to medium term improvement in its markets, investors tend to take that as a pretty bad sign.

What now for Bradken Ltd?

You should view Bradken shares as a high-risk investment. It’s hard to accurately forecast the extent to which mining activity will slow down, and when companies in this sector are going through a phase of lowering investors’ expectations, it’s the ‘picks-and-shovels’ mining services companies whose share prices get crunched harder than the big boys like BHP Billiton Ltd [ASX:BHP] or Rio Tinto Ltd [ASX:RIO].

But as soon as investors see light at the end of the tunnel, mining services stocks like Bradken should rebound in a major way. It’s more a case of ‘when’ rather than ‘if’.

It takes plenty of ticker to wade in and buy these stocks when they’re on their knees. But investors who time the cycle correctly can make great profits in stocks like Bradken.

Tim Dohrmann+
Small-Cap Analyst, Australian Small-Cap Investigator

Join Money Morning on Google+


By MoneyMorning.com.au

Why the Rio Tinto Share Price Fell Today

By MoneyMorning.com.au

What Happened to the Rio Tinto Share Price?

Shares of Rio Tinto [ASX:RIO] dropped by 2.99% on Monday, closing at $60.10. This is the lowest price it’s been since 3rd September 2013.

Why did this Happen to the Rio Tinto Share Price?

Rio Tinto Ltd is the world’s third largest miner. It’s known for its high quality and large scale iron ore operations, located in the Pilbara region of Western Australia.

In terms of scale and size, Rio produces around 23% of the world’s total iron ore traded by sea (seaborne market).

RIO enjoys a high profit margin, boasting an average cost of roughly AU$46 per tonne. This is the lowest cost for any miner in the world.

Nonetheless, Rio is still seen as a play on the iron ore price. The iron ore price has fallen over 26% for the year, and now sits at US$102.80 per tonne.
As such, Rio has seen its share price weaken from above $71 in February to just over $60 today.

What now for Rio Tinto?



RIO has recently reached its long-term ore production goal of 290 million tonnes per year. It’s now focussed on its 360 expansion plan, aiming to mine 360 million tonnes of iron ore per year.

Furthermore, the company has been committed to paying down debt and further strengthen its balance sheet. Since 2013, net debt has been reduced by US$4 billion to roughly $US18 million today.

The company is also on track to slash its capital expenditure to US$8 billion by 2015; this would be nearly halve its 2012 level.

Fundamentally, Rio Tinto is fast becoming an extremely shareholder friendly company.

Nonetheless, if iron ore continues to fall, the share price could see itself slipping into the high $50’s shortly.


By MoneyMorning.com.au

Sometimes it’s Best to Not Look Inside the ‘Investing Sausage’

By MoneyMorning.com.au

There’s an old saying attributed to the former German chancellor Otto von Bismarck, ‘Laws are like sausages, it is better not to see them being made.

Whether Bismarck actually said that or not doesn’t matter.

It’s the words, not the source of the words, that’s important.

The point is that sometimes it’s better if you don’t know what goes on behind the scenes. Sausages are delicious. But maybe you wouldn’t feel that way if you could see the ‘ingredients’.

But that’s not unique to sausages. You can apply this saying to other scenarios. For instance, financial markets…

The Financial Times reports that the head of the investment bank unit at Deutsche Bank has sent a video message to the bank’s traders. He wants them to stop being so boorish:

Let’s be clear: our reputation is everything. Being boastful, indiscreet and vulgar is not OK. It will have serious consequences for your career. And, I have lost patience on this issue.

No doubt the top brass at Deutsche Bank had plenty of patience until six years ago. Back then investment bank traders could be as boorish as they liked…as long as the ‘tills kept ringing’.

That’s changed. But it’s not the behaviour that really unsettles the head honchos. Rather, they’re afraid that internal messages will become public during an investigation by regulators.

In other words, the bankers want you to accept the investment banking ‘sausage’, but they don’t want you to see what goes into making the investment banking ‘sausage’.

They most certainly don’t want you to know about the interest rate and market manipulation that takes place on a daily basis, for which the big banks are now under scrutiny.

Suits, shirts and silk ties

Regulators in the US, UK and Europe are investigating and fining some of the world’s biggest banks for interest rate manipulation.

Last year European regulators fined eight banks a total of EU€1.7 billion for forming illegal cartels to fix interest rates.

Bad boys. But it had been going on for years. Only when they couldn’t hide it anymore did the regulators start to take an interest.

The point is that sometimes financial markets aren’t as clean cut and orderly as people would like to think. The sharp suits, fancy shirts and silk ties disguise a breed of person you probably wouldn’t want to marry your daughter.

They’re boorish, rude, and vulgar. But they make their employers — the investment banks — a lot of money.

Like it or not, it’s an attitude that regular investors need to take with financial markets. There’s no room to be polite when investing. The goal of investing is to use the circumstances to your advantage to make money.

That sometimes may mean taking decisions that you otherwise may prefer not to take. For example, investing in fossil fuel or tobacco companies. It’s a subject we wrote about in Money Morning on 9th May. We received a number of negative letters in response.

In that edition we said that investors can’t afford to think about ethics when investing. We drew a parallel with the campaign against tobacco companies in the 1990s and 2000s. Back then the big US university endowment funds began selling their tobacco shares.

From an investment perspective it was a big mistake. Companies like British & American Tobacco [LON:BATS] gained 533% in the years after. Reynolds American [NYSE:RAI], another big tobacco company, gained 596%.

Today, the university endowments are making the same mistake. This time with fossil fuels. Rather than investing to maximise returns they’re investing to please the green lobbyists. It’s a decision they’ll likely regret as fossil fuels continue to be a key fuel for economic growth.

The ‘human haters’ react

But as we say, not everyone agrees with this view. Money Morning reader Scott wrote to say:

With regards to tobacco investing, “cute move” you say – how about tobacco kills, is the biggest preventable cause of death, and as such, would it not be wise to not support such an industry?

Same with fracking. We humans know very little in the scheme of the universe, but we are great at raping and destroying what we do know.

So you propose we support this? What is the real science and what are the consequences? Where do we go when we have destroyed this planet? Why aren’t alternative energy sources being developed quicker?

It’s typical of the responses we expect from ‘human haters’. Far from destroying the planet, the human race has done more than any other species in history to improve and develop its surroundings to create a more comfortable standard of living.

Is there another species on the planet that has managed to triple the average life expectancy of its own members? Not that we know of. Humans have done that because of the ability to take risks, make decisions and use technology.

But what about the idea that we should consider the ‘real science’ and ‘consequences’ of fracking? Well, you can thank your lucky stars that the original great wildcatting oil explorers of the 19th and early 20th century didn’t consider the ‘science’ and ‘consequences’ when they discovered and exploited oil in Texas and Pennsylvania.

Investing isn’t always pretty

If they had stopped to think about the environmental impact where would the world be today? You most likely wouldn’t be reading this letter online. You most likely wouldn’t have that nice car, or be able to take an electric-powered train to work.

You probably wouldn’t have fast transport such as intercontinental air travel, or other technologies that have come about either directly or indirectly due to the discovery of oil or other chemicals — plastics, paints, synthetic clothing, TVs, whitegoods, and so on.

In fact, if it wasn’t for oil and gas, it’s more likely than not that the world would have kept using to a greater extent than it does today another type of fossil fuel that had been used by humans for millennia — coal.

Now that’s what we call irony.

Bottom line: investing isn’t always pretty. Like the sausage factory, sometimes it’s best if you don’t peek inside. But one thing is undeniable. As an independent investor it’s up to you to make the investment decisions that can help you achieve your investing goals.

For the past 100 years oil has been one of the best investments. And that isn’t likely to change for the next 100 years…whatever the green lobbyists like to think.

Cheers,
Kris+

Join Money Morning on Google+


By MoneyMorning.com.au