{"id":25667,"date":"2011-11-30T09:19:24","date_gmt":"2011-11-30T14:19:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/countingpips.com\/fx\/2011\/11\/30\/is-bank-of-america-playing-a-%e2%80%9cshell-game%e2%80%9d-with-its-derivatives\/"},"modified":"2011-11-30T09:19:24","modified_gmt":"2011-11-30T14:19:24","slug":"is-bank-of-america-playing-a-shell-game-with-its-derivatives","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/fx\/2011\/11\/30\/is-bank-of-america-playing-a-shell-game-with-its-derivatives\/","title":{"rendered":"Is Bank of America Playing a \u201cShell Game\u201d With Its Derivatives?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.investmentu.com\/2011\/November\/bank-of-america-derivative-shell-game.html\">Is Bank of America Playing a &#8220;Shell Game&#8221; With Its Derivatives?<\/a><\/p>\n<p>by Chris Matthai, <em>Investment U<\/em> Research<br \/>\nWednesday, November 30, 2011<\/p>\n<p>According to <em>Bloomberg<\/em>, <strong>Bank of America <\/strong>(NYSE: <a title=\"Bank of America (NYSE: BAC)\" href=\"http:\/\/www.google.com\/finance?q=NYSE%3ABAC\" target=\"_blank\">BAC<\/a>) is currently shifting derivative contracts between its retail deposit bank, Bank of America NA, and its wholly owned brokerage arm, Merrill Lynch.<\/p>\n<p>At first glimpse, no big deal right?<\/p>\n<p>Wrong&#8230; Not when we&#8217;re talking about <em>$75 trillion<\/em> in derivatives contracts that B of A is backing. And regulators may soon be putting an end to these transfers.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter\" src=\"http:\/\/www.investmentu.com\/images\/one-percenters.jpg\" alt=\"derivative activity banking system chart\" width=\"401\" height=\"256\" \/><\/p>\n<p><strong>Problems for Bank of America<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>What&#8217;s at issue is that derivatives contracts usually require counterparties to post collateral in amounts that can increase if their creditworthiness deteriorates. And Bank of America&#8217;s September downgrade from Moody&#8217;s Investor Service is causing problems for B of A.<\/p>\n<p>At stake for Bank of America is the continuing ability to shift derivative obligations between its operating units &#8211; <em>thereby reducing billions of dollars in collateral payments to counterparties<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>Due to the Moody&#8217;s downgrade, Bank of America Corporation has designated the retail-deposit unit, Bank of America NA, as the new counterparty on certain Merrill Lynch contracts. The transfers lower collateral obligations because the retail unit still has a higher rating than the Merrill Lynch subsidiary after the downgrades.<\/p>\n<p>However, the FDIC is not too keen on the idea of shifting derivatives contracts into the books of a deposit-taking bank (that&#8217;s covered by FDIC insurance) and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.investmentu.com\/2011\/August\/us-retail-banks-decline.html\">putting depositors at risk of failure<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>On the other hand, the Federal Reserve, operating under the &#8220;Too Big to Fail&#8221; policy, has signaled that it favors moving the derivatives to give relief to the bank holding company.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Stay Tuned<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The other two major ratings firms &#8211; Standard &amp; Poor&#8217;s and Fitch Ratings &#8211; are re-evaluating Bank of America and may also cut its credit ratings. If that happens, expect the tempo of B of A&#8217;s shell game to accelerate.<\/p>\n<p>While federal regulators remain at odds over B of A&#8217;s derivatives strategy, there should be no doubt in your mind about investing in Bank of America&#8230; Don&#8217;t do it. There&#8217;s still way too much uncertainty surrounding these shares.<\/p>\n<p>Good investing,<\/p>\n<p>Chris Matthai<\/p>\n<div>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~ff\/InvestmentU?a=GH1QqN9LoJc:u_5mmR3lCYk:yIl2AUoC8zA\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~ff\/InvestmentU?d=yIl2AUoC8zA\" border=\"0\"><\/img><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~ff\/InvestmentU?a=GH1QqN9LoJc:u_5mmR3lCYk:V_sGLiPBpWU\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~ff\/InvestmentU?i=GH1QqN9LoJc:u_5mmR3lCYk:V_sGLiPBpWU\" border=\"0\"><\/img><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~ff\/InvestmentU?a=GH1QqN9LoJc:u_5mmR3lCYk:qj6IDK7rITs\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~ff\/InvestmentU?d=qj6IDK7rITs\" border=\"0\"><\/img><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~ff\/InvestmentU?a=GH1QqN9LoJc:u_5mmR3lCYk:gIN9vFwOqvQ\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~ff\/InvestmentU?i=GH1QqN9LoJc:u_5mmR3lCYk:gIN9vFwOqvQ\" border=\"0\"><\/img><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~ff\/InvestmentU?a=GH1QqN9LoJc:u_5mmR3lCYk:F7zBnMyn0Lo\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~ff\/InvestmentU?i=GH1QqN9LoJc:u_5mmR3lCYk:F7zBnMyn0Lo\" border=\"0\"><\/img><\/a>\n<\/div>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~r\/InvestmentU\/~4\/GH1QqN9LoJc\" height=\"1\" width=\"1\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Article by <a href=\"http:\/\/www.investmentu.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Investment U<\/a> <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Is Bank of America Playing a &#8220;Shell Game&#8221; With Its Derivatives? by Chris Matthai, Investment U Research Wednesday, November 30, 2011 According to Bloomberg, Bank of America (NYSE: BAC) is currently shifting derivative contracts between its retail deposit bank, Bank of America NA, and its wholly owned brokerage arm, Merrill Lynch. At first glimpse, no &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/fx\/2011\/11\/30\/is-bank-of-america-playing-a-shell-game-with-its-derivatives\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Is Bank of America Playing a \u201cShell Game\u201d With Its Derivatives?&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-25667","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/fx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25667","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/fx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/fx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/fx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/fx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=25667"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/fx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25667\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/fx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=25667"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/fx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=25667"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/fx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=25667"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}