{"id":20511,"date":"2011-04-05T11:35:15","date_gmt":"2011-04-05T15:35:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/countingpips.com\/fx\/?p=20511"},"modified":"2011-04-05T11:35:15","modified_gmt":"2011-04-05T15:35:15","slug":"how-to-profit-from-nonsense-new-financial-regulations","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/fx\/2011\/04\/05\/how-to-profit-from-nonsense-new-financial-regulations\/","title":{"rendered":"How to Profit From Nonsense — New Financial Regulations"},"content":{"rendered":"

By Jared Levy, Editor, Smart Investing Daily, taipanpublishinggroup.com<\/strong><\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

One way of searching for investment opportunities is to look for businesses that are thriving with products and services that are in demand. But another method for finding investment opportunity is counterintuitive: Look for something that is broken or doesn’t make sense. Once you locate that problem or fault, either look for a company that may have a solution or perhaps look at the problem itself to see if it is viable or just noise.<\/p>\n

Financial regulation<\/a>, or FINREG, is one of those “problems” that contains some noise. FINREG creates challenges for banks, brokerages, lenders and the consumer.<\/p>\n

If you are not completely familiar with the complex 2,300-page bill, The Wall Street Journal<\/em> assembled this interactive page<\/a> that details the different facets.<\/p>\n

How Can You Profit From the Confusion?<\/h3>\n

Sometimes an apparent roadblock (legislation in this case) may have holes that make it less restraining than first thought. Now, I’m not going to say that FINREG isn’t a highly restrictive, far-reaching, costly (in several respects) and poorly timed bill.<\/p>\n

But some parts are just plain ridiculous and bad for the American consumer, and should be altered or removed. One of those pieces is the “Durbin Rule.”<\/p>\n

Back on March 10, in a note to my subscribers of WaveStrength Options Weekly<\/a><\/em> I detailed this flawed piece of the FINREG puzzle:<\/p>\n

Some of you may have heard of the “Durbin Rule” — it’s imbedded in the Dodd-Frank financial regulation bill. <\/em><\/p>\n

The rule essentially states that “interchange fees,” those fees that retails incur anytime you swipe a credit or debit card, are to be limited (fixed) to 12 cents per transaction (the average is 44 cents). It means retailers will be capped in the amount they have to pay in merchant fees that are charged by banks and by Visa, MasterCard, etc. Good news for retailers and bad for banks and our friends over at Visa and MasterCard. This rule equates to BILLIONS of dollars annually!<\/em><\/p>\n

Our genius politicians thought this legislation would benefit the consumer because the retailers would lower prices because of their savings. This may be true in some cases, but there are serious flaws.<\/em><\/p>\n

If this is implemented in its current form, big banks like Bank of America and JPMorgan Chase will lose billions of dollars in revenue, as will Visa and MC. What’s worse is that the bill excludes smaller banks (which was meant to help them), but if small banks continue to charge high fees and the large banks are forced to do it cheaper, the small banks will lose business. <\/em><\/p>\n

All the banks are waging war on Capitol Hill to get this rule overturned or, more realistically, modified, which I believe will happen. <\/em><\/p>\n

Our angle is that the markets have NOT priced in a good outcome for MasterCard, but I believe a compromise will come about, because the rule as it stands now just doesn’t work — this will be beneficial for MA.<\/em><\/p>\n

Since then, MasterCard (MA:NYSE<\/a>)<\/strong> stock went from $241 to a high of $262. WOW<\/em> subscribers were able to capture some fantastic profits there and have since exited, but I wanted to take this a bit further and share this story with you.<\/p>\n

On Tuesday the Federal Reserve declared that it is going to delay its ruling<\/a> on appropriate levels from April 21 till July 21, which was a big win for MA and Visa (V:NYSE<\/a>)<\/strong>, <\/strong>not to mention my hypothesis from two weeks prior.<\/p>\n

What “Durbin” Means for You<\/h3>\n

FINREG is supposed to “help” the American consumer, but aside from the issues for the banks, there are many ways in which this hurts us. Banks have shareholders to report to, which means they must keep profits up. If you take a couple billion dollars away from their balance sheets, they must replace it.<\/p>\n

Guess who gets to replenish their balance sheets? The American Consumer!<\/p>\n

Some of these changes are ALREADY happening, here are some of the ways the Durbin rule and FINREG is “helping” (hurting) you:<\/p>\n