{"id":19173,"date":"2011-02-07T19:13:44","date_gmt":"2011-02-08T00:13:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/countingpips.com\/fx\/?p=19173"},"modified":"2011-02-07T19:13:44","modified_gmt":"2011-02-08T00:13:44","slug":"on-the-docket-the-case-against-diversification","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/fx\/2011\/02\/07\/on-the-docket-the-case-against-diversification\/","title":{"rendered":"On the Docket: The Case Against Diversification"},"content":{"rendered":"<h3><span style=\"font-size: small;\">Just because investment banks and stock brokerages say you should diversify doesn&#8217;t make it true <\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-size: small;\"> <\/span><\/h3>\n<h3><span style=\"font-size: small;\">By Elliott Wave International<\/span><\/h3>\n<p>Talk with an investment advisor, and what&#8217;s the first piece                   of advice you will hear? Diversify your portfolio. The case                   for diversification is repeated so often that it&#8217;s come to                   be thought of as an indisputable rule. Hardly anyone makes                   the case <em>against<\/em> diversifying your portfolio. But                   because we believe that too much liquidity has made all markets                   act similar to one another, we make that case. Heresy? Not                   at all. Just because investment banks and stock brokerages                   say you should diversify doesn&#8217;t make it true. After all, their                   analysts nearly always say that the markets look bullish and                   that people should buy more now. \u00a0For a breath of fresh                   air on this subject, read what Bob Prechter thinks about diversification.<\/p>\n<p>* * * * *<\/p>\n<p><em>Excerpt taken from <\/em><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.elliottwave.com\/r.asp?acn=9cp&amp;rcn=aa166&amp;dy=aa020711&amp;url=more_info\/pp.aspx?code=frcp&amp;articleid=2018\">Prechter&#8217;s                   Perspective<\/a><\/span><em><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">,<\/span> originally published 2002, re-published                     2004<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>Question: In recent years, mainstream experts have                     made the ideas of \u201cbuy and hold\u201d and diversification                     almost synonymous with investing. What about diversification?                     Now it is nearly universally held that risk is reduced through                     acquisition of a broad-based portfolio of any imaginable                     investment category. Where do you stand on this idea?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Bob Prechter: <\/strong>Diversification for its own                   sake means you don\u2019t know what you\u2019re doing. If                   that is true, you might as well hold Treasury bills or a savings                   account. My opinion on this question is black and white, because                   the whole purpose of being a market speculator is to identify                   trends and make money with them. The proper approach is to                   take everything you can out of anticipated trends, using indicators                   that help you do that. Those times you make a mistake will                   be made up many times over by the successful investments you                   make. Some people say that is the purpose of diversification,                   that the winners will overcome the losers. But that stance                   requires the opinion that most investment vehicles ultimately                   go up from any entry point. That is not true, and is an opinion                   typically held late in a period when it has been true. So ironically,                   poor timing is often the thing that kills people who claim                   to ignore timing.<\/p>\n<p>Sometimes the correct approach will lead to a diversified portfolio.                   There are times I have been long U.S. stocks, short bonds,                   short the Nikkei, and long something else. Other times, I\u2019ve                   kept a very concentrated market position. My advice from mid-1984                   to October 2, 1987, for instance, was to remain 100% invested                   in the U.S. stock market. During the bull market, I raised                   the stop-loss at each point along the wave structure where                   I could identify definite points of support. If I was wrong,                   investors would have been out of their positions. The potential                   was five times greater on the upside than the risk was on the                   downside, and five times greater in the stock market than any                   other area. Twice recently, in 1993 and 1995, I have had big                   positions in precious metals mining stocks when they appeared                   to me to be the only game in town. In 1993, it worked great,                   and they gained 100% in ten months. Diversification would have                   eliminated the profit. And every so often, an across-the-board                   deflation smashes all investments at once, and the person who                   has all his eggs in one basket, in this case cash, stays whole                   while everyone else gets killed.<\/p>\n<p>* * * * *<\/p>\n<p><strong>Excerpt from <\/strong><em><strong>The Elliott Wave Theorist<\/strong><\/em><strong>,                   April 29, 1994<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>It is repeated daily that \u201cglobal diversification\u201d is                   self evidently an intelligent approach to investing. In brief,                   goes the line, an investor should not restrict himself to domestic                   stocks and bonds but also buy stocks and bonds of as many other                   countries as possible to \u201cspread the risk\u201d and                   ensure safety. Diversification is a tactic always touted at                   the end of global bull markets. Without years of a bull market                   to provide psychological comfort, this apparently self evident                   truth would not even be considered. No one was making this                   case at the 1974 low. During the craze for collectible coins,                   were you helped in owning rare coins of England, Spain, Japan                   and Malaysia? Or were you that much more hopelessly stuck when                   the bear market hit?<\/p>\n<p><em>The Elliott Wave Theorist<\/em>&#8216;s position                   has been that successful investing requires one thing: anticipating                   successful investments, which requires that one must have a                   method of choosing them. Sometimes that means holding many                   investments, sometimes few. Recommending diversification so                   that novices can reduce risk is like recommending that novice                   skydivers strap a pillow to their backsides to \u201creduce                   risk.\u201d Wouldn\u2019t it be more helpful to                   advise them to avoid skydiving until they have learned all                   about it? Novices should not be investing; they should be saving,                   which means acting to protect their principal, not to generate                   a return when they don\u2019t                   know how.<\/p>\n<p>For the knowledgeable investor, diversification for its own                   sake merely reduces profits. Therefore, anyone championing                   investment diversification for the sake of safety and no other                   reason has no method for choosing investments, no method of                   forming a market opinion, and should not be in the money management                   business. Ironically yet necessarily given today\u2019s conviction                   about diversification, the deflationary trend that will soon                   become monolithic will devastate nearly all financial assets                   except cash. If you want to diversify, buy some 6-month Treasury                   bills along with your 3-month ones.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.elliottwave.com\/r.asp?acn=9cp&amp;rcn=aa166&amp;dy=aa020711&amp;url=http:\/\/www.elliottwave.com\/club\/death-to-diversification\/default.aspx?code=46585%26articleid=2018\">Want                       More Reasons Why Diversification Should be Diverted from                       your Portfolio?<\/a><\/strong><\/span> Get our FREE report that explains                       the holes in the diversification argument. All you have                       to do is sign up as one of our Club EWI members. It&#8217;s free,                       and it will give you access to more than this diversification                       report.<span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"> <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.elliottwave.com\/r.asp?acn=9cp&amp;rcn=aa166&amp;dy=aa020711&amp;url=http:\/\/www.elliottwave.com\/club\/death-to-diversification\/default.aspx?code=46585%26articleid=2018\">Follow                       this link to instantly download this special free report,                       Death to Diversification \u2013 What it Means for Your                       Investment Strategy.<\/a><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<div>\n<p><em>This                     article was syndicated by Elliott Wave International and                     was originally published under the headline <a href=\"http:\/\/www.elliottwave.com\/r.asp?acn=9cp&amp;rcn=aa166&amp;dy=aa020711&amp;url=http:\/\/www.elliottwave.com\/freeupdates\/archives\/2011\/02\/03\/On-the-Docket-The-Case-against-Diversification.aspx%26articleid=2018\"><strong>On the Docket: The Case Against Diversification<\/strong><\/a>.                     EWI is the world&#8217;s largest market forecasting firm. Its staff                     of full-time analysts led by Chartered Market Technician                     Robert Prechter provides 24-hour-a-day market analysis to                 institutional and private investors around the world.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Talk with an investment advisor, and what&#8217;s the first piece of advice you will hear? Diversify your portfolio. The case for diversification is repeated so often that it&#8217;s come to be thought of as an indisputable rule.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-19173","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/fx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19173","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/fx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/fx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/fx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/fx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=19173"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/fx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19173\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/fx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=19173"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/fx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=19173"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/fx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=19173"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}