{"id":18172,"date":"2011-01-16T18:02:59","date_gmt":"2011-01-16T23:02:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/countingpips.com\/fx\/?p=18172"},"modified":"2011-01-16T18:02:59","modified_gmt":"2011-01-16T23:02:59","slug":"forex-and-commodities-what-will-bring-the-year-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/fx\/2011\/01\/16\/forex-and-commodities-what-will-bring-the-year-2011\/","title":{"rendered":"Forex and Commodities: What will bring the year 2011?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>By John White<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Predicting exchange rates is very difficult in the short term.  Longer-term forecasts are inaccurate, and unfortunately the majority of  variation in the order of several hundred points is common for long-term  prediction. In the long run, so fully realized the difference between  trading and investing &#8211; investing without leverage is greatly  facilitates the ability to &#8220;stand for&#8221; a few hundred points drawdown.<\/p>\n<p>The  year 2010 was largely influenced by the debt crisis and the second  round of quantitative easing in the U.S.. These two factors are likely  to remain on the radar of traders again in 2011. Will be added to them  the possibility of slowing growth in China, which would be reflected in  the power of commodity currencies.<\/p>\n<p>Despite all the current  problems with the disintegration of the euro area (so far!) Seems  unlikely. The political will to keep together the euro area is still  high enough to keep this incredibly difficult and expensive project  alive. The European Central Bank has arrangements (buying bonds  peripheral EU, enlargement of the European Fund for financial stability,  increased financial assistance for the assistance of the IMF, the  confirmation of the availability of funds in an emergency situation,  etc.) that can be used not only for stabilization of the European bond  market. Stabilization of bonds would then lead to the stabilization of  the fall of the euro and possible korektivn\u00edmu strengthening.  Korektivn\u00edmu because the amount of debt reduction and the rating of the  euro area, along with warnings about possible further reductions will be  aware of traders and prevents excessive strengthening. The overall  outlook is slightly negative. Band for 2011: 1.3750 to 1.2500<\/p>\n<p>Significantly  expanding the U.S. policy in the years 2009 and 2010 helped to  stabilize and subsequent recovery in GDP growth. Unfortunately, every  coin has two sides: the expansionist policies aggravated the debt in the  coming years will cause many problems.<\/p>\n<p>In terms of U.S. $ will be  the primary setters developments during 2011 the possibility of higher  interest rates and the level of economic growth. Due to austerity  measures and increased taxes in many EU countries can be expected that  the United States will benefit from the growth of the economy before the  EU&#8217;s lead.<\/p>\n<p>Quantitative easing (QE) in the U.S. partly  contributed to GDP growth and other fundamental indicators. Continued  improvement of economic development would lead to the possibility that  the Fed does not apply any money for QE. The discussion of such options  would respond by strengthening USD.<\/p>\n<p>As long as unemployment is  close to the current 9.8% and inflation remains very low, the Fed ready  to use all means and opportunities that will increase interest rates  remain very low. Strong growth in U.S. $ this would not be likely.  However, if an improvement in the labor market and increased inflation,  the Fed could begin to signal a rate hike, which would turn the  underlying trend and the possibility of a significant strengthening U.S.  dollar. This option is not in the first half of the year probably. The  overall outlook is positive. Band for 2011 to USD Index: 76.00 to 88.00.<\/p>\n<p>On  the currency market developments and in particular its volatility will  certainly affect the development in China. China&#8217;s inflation is  currently on a two-year maximum and the Chinese central bank increased  the PBoC rate since mid-October the two. Further monetary policy  tightening is likely and could have far-reaching implications. The  higher rates of most stock markets react sale. Fall of the major stock  indexes &#8220;Hang Seng&#8221; in Hong Kong &#8220;SSE&#8221; in Shanghai would certainly lead  to falls of other world indices. The sharp fall of stock markets  benefited from USD safe haven status, and Japanese investment is  returned to Japan &#8211; JPY strengthens therefore, usually more than USD, so  the USDJPY drops. Currencies of countries with higher rates such as AUD  and NZD, which are traditionally used for speculative carry trade  during the fall of stock markets weaken substantially.<\/p>\n<p>At the risk  of a &#8220;bubble&#8221; in the Chinese real estate market and bad loans of  Chinese banks highlights a number of analysts have quite a long time.  The risk of falling real estate prices are increasing every month and an  increase in rates could be he a trigger mechanism that causes the  bubble burst. In terms of risk &#8220;shock&#8221; that would cause a temporary high  risk aversion is the development of China&#8217;s very important.<\/p>\n<p>China&#8217;s  economy is growing about 10% annually and imports huge quantities of  commodities. When slowing down, the import of these commodities would be  reduced. This would greatly harm the countries that export to China,  particularly Australia and therefore the AUD.<\/p>\n<p>When I mentioned  Australia, I can not resist a few comments: house prices continually  rising, and among the highest in the world. Australia during 2010 raised  interest rates four times and generally a full percentage point. As a  consequence of the increased number of mortgage defaults. Taking into  account the above-mentioned risks, and also that based on the PPP is the  Australian dollar overvalued by about 30%, I see no place for the AUD  to strengthen significantly.<\/p>\n<p>The Australian dollar is very  sensitive to changes in risk aversion, so the signs extension \/  deepening of the crisis and the fall in stock markets would lead to  large v\u00fdprodej\u016fm. The risk that the repeated collapse similar to the one  we saw in mid-2008 when AUDUSD over four months fell from 0.98 to 0.60  is probably not high, but depending on the trend of strengthening the  AUD will continue indefinitely could be very dangerous. The possibility  of disappointment from the development of the Australian economy seems  to me very much and therefore I think that next year AUD closed at a  lower level. Band for 2011: 1.0500 to 0.9350.<\/p>\n<p>In the longer term  are important for exchange rates of inflation, interest rates and GDP  growth. But we must not forget the hard to define &#8220;market sentiment&#8221;,  which may have a greater impact than short-term fundamentals. 2010 was a  year of high volatility. Because of the potential risks (enlargement of  the European debt crisis or even failure to pay bond investors, the  fall of stocks and shares fall mainly in emerging markets, escalating  tensions on the Korean Peninsula or in Iran, etc.). I&#8217;m very skeptical  of the notion that 2011 will be a year of stabilization, security and  low volatility.<\/p>\n<p>Technical view:<\/p>\n<p>Chart: Weekly, moving averages: 10 +50 +100 +200 SMA<\/p>\n<p>The  price is below 10, 100 and 200 SMA which can be seen as confirmation of  a bearish trend. Price broke through the 50 SMA, but not yet above this  average did not close. Even if the closure had occurred, the price of  each lot of resistance, the outermost of which is headed downward trend  line, which over the last maximum 1.4280. In the medium term will cost  considerably easier to achieve at lower levels than at higher, because  the support for 1.30 is the next support up to 1.25. The probability of  achieving the level of around 1.25 I think it is in the medium term as  high.<\/p>\n<p>The situation on the USD index is in terms of moving  averages are ambiguous. All four moving averages but grouped in a very  narrow band, from which one can conclude that the early penetration of  the zone occurs. According to the trend line heading up the breakdown  should be to the north. Break in at 82.00 would be very important  Bullish technical signals and the way to 88.00 it would not prevent the  index.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Correctly&#8221; ordered the moving averages  confirmed a strong trend is Bullish. What is interesting in this graph,  the distance between price and 100 or 200 SMA. This distance can be  regarded as extreme and strategies based on a return to long-term  average, therefore, suggest a lower value. Boring of the previous low or  below 10 SMA can be seen as a bearish signal.<\/p>\n<p>The situation  for gold is very similar to the situation in the AUDUSD. Here we have  sorted correctly confirming the strength of the SMA trend. The distance  between the price and 100 or 200 SMA is really significant (26% and 46%)  so that the average short-term retracement is likely. Break in the past  the minimum or below 10 SMA is the minimum requirement for a signal  marking a change in trend.<\/p>\n<p>More on <a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/www.proofi.com\/\" target=\"_new\">http:\/\/www.proofi.com<\/a><\/p>\n<h3>About the Author<\/h3>\n<p>I am writer of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.proofi.com\/\" target=\"_new\">http:\/\/www.proofi.com<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Predicting exchange rates is very difficult in the short term. Longer-term forecasts are inaccurate, and unfortunately the majority of variation in the order of several hundred points is common for long-term prediction.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-18172","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/fx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18172","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/fx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/fx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/fx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/fx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=18172"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/fx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18172\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/fx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=18172"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/fx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=18172"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/fx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=18172"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}