{"id":61754,"date":"2014-10-12T08:48:10","date_gmt":"2014-10-12T12:48:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/countingpips.com\/?p=61754"},"modified":"2014-10-12T08:48:10","modified_gmt":"2014-10-12T12:48:10","slug":"outside-the-box-the-worlds-greatest-stock-picker-bet-you-sold-apple-and-google-a-long-time-ago","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex\/2014\/10\/outside-the-box-the-worlds-greatest-stock-picker-bet-you-sold-apple-and-google-a-long-time-ago\/","title":{"rendered":"Outside the Box: The world\u2019s greatest stock picker? Bet you sold Apple and Google a long time ago."},"content":{"rendered":"
October 12, 2014<\/div>
\r\n<\/div><\/div>

By John Mauldin<\/span><\/h4>\n
\"\"My good friend Barry Ritholtz, famous for launching The Big Picture<\/em> blog (and since graduating to being a regular Bloomberg columnist as well as writing a weekly column for the Washington Post),<\/em> is well-known for being a contrarian. Barry is a regular dinner partner when I get to New York, and he also participates in the annual Maine fishing trip. We frequently trade information \u2026 and barbs. The word colorful<\/em> affectionately comes to mind when I think of Barry (and maybe opinionated<\/em> would work).<\/p>\n

I can usually count on him to find at least a few things to disagree with me on at our dinners. No matter what devastating arguments I produce to demonstrate the errors in his thinking, he conjures up new facts to support his flawed positions. We have had a few of these episodes as members of a panel in front of a large public audience, much to the amusement of the spectators (and watching Barry can be an entertaining spectacle). My only real frustration with Barry is that he is mentally faster than I am and he seemingly remembers every obscure data point from the last thousand years. I consider it a triumph if I merely hold my ground.<\/p>\n

But one thing we do agree on and are both passionate about is that we human beings were not designed for these modern times. As I so often say, we evolved on the African savanna dodging lions and chasing antelopes. We have converted those survival instincts into an unwieldy approach to dealing with financial markets, which is not the optimal way to approach investing. Both of us write a great deal about behavioral investing and the foibles of human nature.<\/p>\n

I was struck by the insights of Barry\u2019s latest Washington Post<\/em> column<\/a>. How difficult it is for us humans to hold on in the middle of dramatic volatility. Don\u2019t you wish you had held Apple for the last 10 years? A 1000-bagger is not to be sneezed at. But dear gods, the volatility! And what about the stocks that once looked like a better bet than Apple that went to zero? How do you decide when to hold and when to fold? (Cue Kenny Rogers<\/a>.)<\/p>\n

This is a short Outside the Box,<\/em> but it\u2019s one that should make you think, which is the purpose of this letter.<\/p>\n

And in a departure from my usual close, I want to offer two links. The first is to a fascinating web post at something called distractify.com of 52 colorized historical photos<\/a>. You\u00a0 have seen most of these photos in black and white (or at least you have if you have reached my advanced age). Seeing them in color is quite another story.<\/p>

\r\n
\r\n

Free Reports:<\/p><\/div>\r\n

\r\n

<\/a>\r\n\t Get Our Free Metatrader 4 Indicators<\/u><\/b><\/a> - Put Our Free MetaTrader 4 Custom Indicators on your charts when you join our Weekly Newsletter<\/p>

\r\n
\r\n
\r\n

<\/a>\r\n\t Get our Weekly Commitment of Traders Reports<\/u><\/b><\/a> - See where the biggest traders (Hedge Funds and Commercial Hedgers) are positioned in the futures markets on a weekly basis.<\/p>

\r\n<\/div>\r\n

\r\n
<\/div>\n

Second, and not for the faint of heart, is a link to a rather heated exchange<\/a> between Ben Affleck and Bill Maher over radical Islam and Islamaphobia. I generally find Maher annoying, sometimes in the extreme. But this \u201cconversation\u201d is instructive. It illustrates the tensions in the Western world around dealing with Islamic beliefs and the religion in general. The other guests chime in with fascinating anecdotes. You can decide for yourself who wins this argument, but it is one that is increasingly important in our world. And I am not sure anyone will be comfortable with the answers. This is courtesy of my friends over at Real Clear Politics.<\/p>\n

I am still luxuriating in the aftermath of my birthday party on Saturday night. Friends flew in from all over the country (and from around the world) and surprised me. Too many to mention, but I was deeply honored and humbled. My staff and friends and family put the whole thing together (huge thanks to Shannon and Mary and Shane and my kids). My daughter Melissa put together a playlist on Spotify of all the songs she has heard me listening to over the years. Three and a half hours of one hit after another. We are working on making it available to those of you who are already on Spotify.<\/p>\n

And just for the record, that morning I did 66 consecutive push-ups on my 65th<\/sup> birthday. I then went on to do a total of 360 push-ups (50\u00d75+44) in less than two hours, with the help of an Avacor machine to cool me down between sets, in a workout that included a similar number of abs, lat pulldowns, arm exercises, etc. Knock on wood,\u00a0I do not plan to go gently into that good night. As a geek, I am coming late in life to loving the gym. But better late\u2026<\/p>\n

It is time to hit the send button. I am off to the Great Investors\u2019 Best Ideas Symposium here in Dallas. It is a who\u2019s who of famous investors, all of whom agreed to speak and to give one investment tip to aid a great charity. Bill Ackman, David Einhorn, Paul Isaac, Bill Miller, Ray Nixon, Richard Perry, T. Boone Pickens, Michael Price, Tom Russo, and moderated by Gretchen Morgenson. Have a great week while thinking about how to get your human nature under control.<\/p>\n

Your more human that I want to admit analyst,<\/p>\n

John Mauldin, Editor
\nOutside the Box<\/em>subscribers@mauldineconomics.com<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

\n

Stay Ahead of the Latest Tech News and Investing Trends…<\/p>\n

Click here to sign up for Patrick Cox\u2019s free daily tech news digest<\/a>.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Each day, you get the three tech news stories with the biggest potential impact.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

The world\u2019s greatest stock picker? Bet you sold Apple and Google a long time ago.<\/strong><\/span><\/h2>\n

By Barry Ritholtz
\nThe Washington Post, <\/em>Oct. 4, 2014<\/a><\/p>\n

Let\u2019s imagine for the moment that you are the World\u2019s Greatest Stock Picker. You have an uncanny talent for ferreting out \u201cthe next Microsoft\u201d \u2013 companies that are on the sharpest edge of what\u2019s next, that are about to undergo tremendous growth. These firms will rule the world: They will be the most powerful, profitable and influential corporate entities known to man.<\/p>\n

Even better, your superpower is that you can find these companies when they are tiny, before they have had their explosive growth, when hardly anyone has heard of them. You find and buy these stocks while their prices are still in the single digits. Companies like Apple, Google, Tesla, Netflix and Chipotle that will one day measure their growth in increments of thousands of a percent.<\/p>\n

Can you imagine how much wealth you could create?<\/p>\n

I have some bad news for you, kiddos: Even if you had that superpower, it would be worth surprisingly little to you. The odds are that it would not create much wealth, and it might even cost you money.<\/p>\n

How could that be possible?<\/p>\n

The short answer is your brain. The three-pound ball of gray matter sitting atop your spinal cord was never designed to make risk\/reward decisions in capital markets. It took about 100,000 years to optimize for its intended purpose: Keeping you alive.<\/p>\n

The occasional Darwin Award aside, it does an outstanding job of keeping you safe from all manner of predators on the savanna. That you now live in a condo and enjoy lattes is irrelevant to its functionality. Its job remains keeping you alive long enough for you to procreate, pass your genes along and perpetuate the species.<\/p>\n

This dynamic, opportunistic, self-organizing system of systems occasionally runs into trouble when we try to force it to perform other, \u201coff-label\u201d uses. That includes buying and selling pieces of paper that represent tiny slices of companies. As we shall see, that big, under-utilized brain of yours is no help anytime it gets over-stimulated by your emotions.<\/p>\n

Which is precisely why being the World\u2019s Greatest Stock Picker is unlikely to be how any of you is going to get rich. Let\u2019s use the shares of five companies as examples: Google, Tesla, Chipotle, Netflix and Apple.<\/p>\n

The performance of each since its initial public stock offering has been nothing short of astounding. Since going public, each stock has generated returns of more than 1,000 percent. A $10,000 IPO allocation in any one is now worth at least $100,000.<\/p>\n

To give you an idea of just how phenomenal these companies have done, Google is the laggard of the lot. Since its IPO in August 2004, it has gained a mere 1,282 percent. Tesla edged out the boys from Mountain View, Calif., with a gain of 1,352 percent. And they did it in less than four years \u2013 Tesla\u2019s IPO was June 2010 \u2013 vs. the decade it took Google to gain 1,000 percent.<\/p>\n

Those spectacular returns look downright paltry compared with the 2,865 percent gain Chipotle has had since going public in 2006. And Netflix beats that, rising 5,816 percent since 2002.<\/p>\n

Then there is Apple. It is a beast unto itself, racking up a mind-boggling 22,288 percent in appreciation since its 1980 debut. It has become world\u2019s biggest company by market capitalization.<\/p>\n

Even if you bought large chunks of each of these firms at their IPOs, the odds are that nearly all of these giant gains would have eluded you. Why? As I shall show you, each of these companies would have sent you running for the exits \u2013 repeatedly \u2013 over the years, screaming as if your hair were on fire.<\/p>\n

Don\u2019t believe me? Consider the facts:<\/p>\n

\u2022 Netflix has lost 25 percent of its value on four separate days. Not over four days; on separate occasions, it lost 25 percent in a single day. In one four-month stretch in 2011, it lost 80 percent of its value. On Netflix\u2019s worst day, it fell 41 percent.<\/p>\n

\u2022 Chipotle has lost 15 percent in a single day on four occasions. During the 2007-2009 crash, it lost 76 percent of its value \u2013 about 50 percent worse than the market overall.<\/p>\n

\u2022 Tesla went up 400 percent in 6 months, then lost 40 percent over the next 10 weeks. In one month, it lost about 25 percent of its value.<\/p>\n

\u2022 Google lost nearly 70 percent in the Great Recession. During its worst quarter, its stock price fell more than 36 percent.<\/p>\n

\u2022 Apple has lost 25 percent or more six times in the past 10 years alone. That was after its meteoric rise. During its worst week, it was cut in half, falling 51 percent. It saw similar damage during its worst month and quarter as well \u2013 getting cut in half in each time\u00a0\u00a0 period.<\/p>\n

How often have you invested in a stock, only to get scared out of it when things grew shaky? That\u2019s fairly typical behavior for investors.<\/p>\n

Now imagine how you would have behaved if you happened to have a significant part of your net worth tied up in that one holding.<\/p>\n

Let\u2019s say a decade ago, you put $15,000 into Apple. You bought 1,000 shares at $15 (with $13 cash) because you thought that newfangled iPod had some potential. Since then, it split two for one and then earlier this year, it split seven for one. You now are holding 14,000 shares of Apple. At the current price of about $100, it is worth $1.4\u00a0million dollars. For most people, this is a very high percentage of their net worth. How well do you sleep when 90 percent of your total net worth goes through giant swings?<\/p>\n

Apple was worth about the same amount in September 2012 \u2013 just before it gave back almost half its value, falling 44 percent. Would you have held on? What about all of those prior 50 percent corrections?<\/p>\n

This is not an academic theory. Consider how you have reacted to much more modest drops in your holdings. How often were you shaken out of a stock, only to see it rocket higher after you sold? And somebody was dumping stocks in March 2009; after all, selling climaxes (also known as capitulation) are how bottoms are made.<\/p>\n

Some years ago, I recommended to the brokers I worked with to do just that regarding Apple. They bought millions of shares at an average price of $15. At $20 dollars, they were selling it, whooping it up and high-fiving one another. When I asked why they were selling it when my price target was higher ($30!), I was told: \u201cIt\u2019s a 33 percent winner \u2013 time to ring the bell, Ritholtz!\u201d That was even before any trouble had hit.<\/p>\n

How many of you, dear readers, could hold onto a giant winner like these five for the duration? How do you know that any of these are not about to turn into a classic disaster stock? Think about once-giant winners that collapsed: Lehman Brothers, WorldCom, Lucent, JDS Uniphase.<\/p>\n

All of these were one-time market heroes; all went bust in spectacular fashion. Your superpower gives you the ability to find the giant winners, but it does not give you the ability to hold onto them, nor does it give you the ability to distinguish between the superstars and the washouts.<\/p>\n

As we have discussed previously, this is a feature, not a bug. The good news is your brain has kept you alive long enough to read this column. The bad news, it also made you sell Apple 10,000 percent ago.<\/p>\n

The reality is, when it comes to risk\/reward decisions, you are just not built for it.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Barry Ritholtz is Chairman and Chief Investment Officer at Ritholtz Wealth Management<\/a>. His columns<\/a> on personal finance can be found at the Washington Post.<\/em> His daily musings on all things finance- & Wall Street-related can be found on Bloomberg View<\/a>. Be sure to check out Masters in Business<\/a>, his weekly interview series on Bloomberg Radio. Follow him on Twitter @Ritholtz<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Like\u00a0Outside the Box?<\/em>
\nSign up today<\/a><\/span> and get each new issue delivered free to your inbox.
\nIt’s your opportunity to get the news John Mauldin thinks matters most to your finances.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Important Disclosures<\/em><\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n<\/div>\n

The article Outside the Box: The world\u2019s greatest stock picker? Bet you sold Apple and Google a long time ago.<\/a> was originally published at mauldineconomics.com<\/a>.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

By John Mauldin My good friend Barry Ritholtz, famous for launching The Big Picture blog (and since graduating to being a regular Bloomberg columnist as well as writing a weekly column for the Washington Post), is well-known for being a contrarian. Barry is a regular dinner partner when I get to New York, and he […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-61754","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","no-post-thumbnail"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61754","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=61754"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61754\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=61754"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=61754"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=61754"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}