{"id":158401,"date":"2019-10-25T07:24:17","date_gmt":"2019-10-25T11:24:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.countingpips.com\/?p=158401"},"modified":"2019-10-25T07:24:17","modified_gmt":"2019-10-25T11:24:17","slug":"the-mystery-of-chinas-third-quarter-growth-resilience-or-gloom","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex\/2019\/10\/the-mystery-of-chinas-third-quarter-growth-resilience-or-gloom\/","title":{"rendered":"The Mystery of China\u2019s Third-Quarter Growth – Resilience or Gloom?"},"content":{"rendered":"
October 25, 2019<\/div>
\r\n<\/div><\/div>

By Dan Steinbock <\/b><\/strong><\/p>\n

Despite trade wars and geopolitics, Chinese economic growth shows resilience. So why is there a deep gap between the third-quarter data and gloomy international headlines?<\/b><\/strong><\/p>\n

After the release of third-quarter data, The Wall Street Journal headline sounded a warning: \u201cChina\u2019s economic growth slowest in decades.\u201d CNN seconded: \u201cChina\u2019s economic growth drops to lowest level since 1992.\u201d Reuters extended the timeline: \u201cChina\u2019s GDP growth grinds to near 30-year low as tariffs hit production.\u201d<\/p>\n

The fallacy in these headlines is that they mistake business cycles for secular trends and vice versa. When countries industrialize, they enjoy relatively high growth. After industrialization, growth rates decelerate. China is no exception.<\/p>\n

In reality, much of recent quarterly data in China and<\/i><\/em>\u00a0other major economies has been penalized for the same reason \u2013 the US-launched trade wars and geopolitics, which foster diminished global economic prospects.<\/p>\n

Only 0.1% behind quarterly expectations<\/b><\/strong><\/p>

\r\n
\r\n

Free Reports:<\/p><\/div>\r\n

\r\n

<\/a>\r\n\t Get Our Free Metatrader 4 Indicators<\/u><\/b><\/a> - Put Our Free MetaTrader 4 Custom Indicators on your charts when you join our Weekly Newsletter<\/p>

\r\n
\r\n
\r\n

<\/a>\r\n\t Get our Weekly Commitment of Traders Reports<\/u><\/b><\/a> - See where the biggest traders (Hedge Funds and Commercial Hedgers) are positioned in the futures markets on a weekly basis.<\/p>

\r\n<\/div>\r\n

\r\n
<\/div>\n

In secular terms, China\u2019s economic growth has been gradually decelerating since the early 2010s, as it should after years of high-growth industrialization. Yet, per capita incomes will almost double in the ongoing decade. In other words, economic growth is decelerating, but living standards continue to rise.<\/p>\n

That\u2019s very different from major advanced economies in which economic prospects continue to stagnate, in both secular and cyclical terms.<\/p>\n

In the United States, the living standards of middle-class and working people have lingered since the 1980s contributing to steep income polarization. In the eurozone, polarization is not as bad yet, but it is deepening. In contrast, China\u2019s middle-income groups continue to expand.<\/p>\n

In terms of cyclical data, China\u2019s economic growth slowed to 6.0 percent from 6.2 percent in the second quarter. But seriously, how much did the actual result differ from the expected one? Analysts polled by Reuters had forecast GDP to grow 6.1 percent in the July-September quarter from a year earlier. So the difference was a mere 0.1 percent.<\/p>\n

So why the hullabaloo? Such a slight deviation does not warrant panicky headlines. Nor do such reports provide appropriate guidance to US investors.<\/p>\n

Unlike the media, institutional investors see economic resilience in China, even amid trade wars and geopolitical pressures. That\u2019s why almost half of fixed income institutional investors outside China plan to increase their exposure to China-issued debt in the coming year, according to FinanceAsia<\/i><\/em>.<\/p>\n

Cyclical resilience, secular potential<\/b><\/strong><\/p>\n

On the Chinese mainland, positive signs include growth in industrial production, which picked up in September, despite reduced export growth. And while months of trade wars have made consumers more cost-conscious, retail sales climbed to 7.8 percent, thanks to state council’s slate of policy supports. The latter are warranted because wage growth remains restrained.<\/p>\n

Property prices have stayed relatively strong, which has left a substantial burden on households\u2019 shoulders. Since household debt to disposable income climbed to nearly 140 percent in 2018, household spending will be more cautious, as evidenced by lingering car sales. Yet, the big picture is more nuanced. For instance, education and medical expenditures remain solid.<\/p>\n

Indeed, China’s secular potential remains strong. The growth rate is still three-to-four times faster than in major advanced economies. The rebalancing of the Chinese economy toward innovation and consumption remains on track. And while the contribution of investment rose to 19.8 percent of the GDP, that of consumption climbed to 60.5 percent.<\/p>\n

The International Monetary Fund has projected China\u2019s GDP growth to slow to 5.8 percent by 2020. That scenario presumes weakened consumption, coupled with cautious private investment and shrinking exports. But the final figure may be more likely to hover around 5.8-6.2 percent in 2020, depending on the severity of the headwinds in trade \u2013 which will result in further fiscal and monetary accommodation and thus slower deleveraging.<\/p>\n

It is not the policy the Chinese authorities would normally prefer, but we do not live in normal times.<\/p>\n

Policy mistakes and global uncertainty <\/b><\/strong><\/p>\n

When the Trump administration adopted a protectionist trade policy some two years ago, it not only committed the worst US policy mistake in the postwar era but also undermined the nascent global recovery.<\/p>\n

Before the US launched the trade war against China, its annual GDP growth rate peaked at 3.2 percent in mid-2018. Now it has almost halved to 1.8 percent. As for the eurozone, after a peak at 3 percent in January 2018, its growth has tumbled to about 1 percent; even before Germany\u2019s economic uncertainties over Brexit. In Japan, too, growth has plunged to below 1 percent after climbing to 2.4 percent in early 2018.<\/p>\n

In 2017, global economic growth was as high as 3.8 percent. Given the right policies, it might have exceeded 4 percent in 2018 and this year. Instead, thanks to US trade protectionism and geopolitical friction, global integration has stalled. World trade is at pre-2008 levels, and the same goes for world investment. As migration flows have plunged, the number of globally displaced exceeds 71 million;15 million more than\u00a0at the end of World War II.<\/p>\n

If misguided policies are permitted to prevail, these adverse trends are likely to further intensify, compounded by potential impeachment divisions in the US, recessionary landscape in the eurozone and stagnation in Japan.<\/p>\n

Guided by US policy mistakes, the global economy is now amid a \u201csynchronized slowdown,\u201d as the IMF has warned. But there is much worse ahead, if these mistakes are permitted to prevail.<\/p>\n

About the Author:<\/i><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

Dr. Dan Steinbock is the founder of Difference Group and has served at the India, China and America Institute (US), Shanghai Institute for International Studies (China) and the EU Center (Singapore). For more, see <\/i><\/em>https:\/\/www.differencegroup.net\/<\/i><\/u><\/em><\/a>\u00a0\u00a0<\/i><\/em><\/p>\n

The original version was released by China Daily, China\u2019s leading English-language daily, on October 25, 2019<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

By Dan Steinbock Despite trade wars and geopolitics, Chinese economic growth shows resilience. So why is there a deep gap between the third-quarter data and gloomy international headlines? After the release of third-quarter data, The Wall Street Journal headline sounded a warning: \u201cChina\u2019s economic growth slowest in decades.\u201d CNN seconded: \u201cChina\u2019s economic growth drops to […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-158401","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","no-post-thumbnail"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/158401","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=158401"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/158401\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":158402,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/158401\/revisions\/158402"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=158401"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=158401"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=158401"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}