{"id":49492,"date":"2014-04-07T21:33:49","date_gmt":"2014-04-08T01:33:49","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/countingpips.com\/forex-news\/?p=49492"},"modified":"2014-04-07T21:33:49","modified_gmt":"2014-04-08T01:33:49","slug":"apple-will-lose-the-smartphone-wars","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex-news\/2014\/04\/07\/apple-will-lose-the-smartphone-wars\/","title":{"rendered":"Apple Will Lose the Smartphone Wars"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>By <a href=\"http:\/\/ift.tt\/10cDh0v\" target=\"_blank\"><u>MoneyMorning.com.au<\/u><\/a><\/p>\n<p>The legal  battles surrounding mobile devices, the so-called &lsquo;<em>smartphone patent wars&rsquo;<\/em>, are absolutely fascinating.<\/p>\n<p>Last week saw  Samsung and Apple limbering up for another US courtroom drama, with Apple  claiming to be the great innovator. We&rsquo;re all supposed to believe that  <strong>smartphones<\/strong> didn&rsquo;t exist before they came up with their iPhone. While it&rsquo;s true  Apple came up with a great product, can they really claim a monopoly on rounded  corners on a rectangle? Or perhaps a patent on a <em>sliding<\/em> switch?<\/p>\n<p>I mean, I&rsquo;ve  always enjoyed the beautifully crafted rounded corners on my oak-cased Roberts  radio. And come to think of it, it also had a sliding switch! What gives?<\/p>\n<p>Of course,  those in the know tell me there&rsquo;s much more to it than that&#8230;but is there  really? It strikes me that Apple is exhibiting the classic symptoms of a monopoly  power that&rsquo;s losing its grip.<\/p>\n<p>The courtroom  battle may well be between <strong>Apple and Samsung<\/strong>. But be under no illusion. The  real battle is between <strong>Google and Apple<\/strong>. <\/p>\n<p>And in this  battle, I&rsquo;ve already nailed my colours to the mast. Apple is fighting to maintain  its slot as the globe&rsquo;s top company. But Google is nipping at its heels and no  amount of courtroom drama will keep Apple from being toppled.<\/p>\n<h2>This Time Samsung Has Backup<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n<p>You&rsquo;ll often hear it said that when it comes  to courtroom battles, it&rsquo;s the guy with the biggest chequebook that wins. And  Apple certainly has a fat chequebook. <\/p>\n<p>But it&rsquo;s not as if Samsung hasn&rsquo;t got a  decent legal team of its own. It has! And I strongly believe that justice  prevails in the end. Already it seems Judge Lucy Koh&rsquo;s Californian courtroom is  starting to lose patience with Apple&rsquo;s monopolistic ambitions. <\/p>\n<p>After all, this isn&rsquo;t the first time <strong>Apple<\/strong>  has dragged Samsung into the courtroom. In the first foray, Apple was awarded  just shy of a billion dollars in damages. But in reality, the skirmish was seen  as a win for Samsung. The firm was still able to sell its units in the States,  and Apple was told to pipe down on most of its claims.<\/p>\n<p>This time round, Samsung is also likely to  have Google on its side. <em>The Wall Street  Journal<\/em> reports that Google engineers, including former Android Chief Andy  Rubin, may testify. <\/p>\n<p>&lsquo;<em>Google  will be a lot more front and centre than in previous cases,<\/em>&rsquo; claims Michael  Carrier, a patent expert and law professor at Rutgers University in New Jersey.  &lsquo;<em>Google vs. Apple makes it more of a  clash of the titans on the same turf.<\/em>&rsquo;<\/p>\n<p>And don&rsquo;t forget, Google also has a  considerable patent portfolio. A few years back, Google bought Motorola in a  deal that netted little more than a library of patents. Google later sold the  actual phones business at a massive loss. <\/p>\n<p>It seems that this courtroom drama will be a  series of claims by Apple, followed by a whole host of counter-claims from  Samsung (aided and abetted by Google). <\/p>\n<h2>Apple is Turning into a Bully<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n<p>I&rsquo;ve never been  a fan of Apple&rsquo;s &lsquo;closed-wall&rsquo; approach to <a href=\"http:\/\/ift.tt\/14mHOzJ\" title=\"more on technology \">technology<\/a>. That is, how it ties  users in to its software, hardware and &lsquo;family&rsquo; of online products. The  business model is based on a monopolistic game-plan. Now, don&rsquo;t get me wrong,  Apple has every right to pursue its business model as it likes.<\/p>\n<p>But public  perception is starting to go the wrong way for Apple. Journalists jibe Apple,  suggesting that perhaps French cheese makers should await court papers from  Apple for patent infringement on the rounded corners on a lump of Roquefort!<\/p>\n<p>Nobody likes a  bully. And that&rsquo;s increasingly what Apple looks like. <\/p>\n<p>The fact of the  matter is that competition is a delicate balance between innovation and copycat  production.<\/p>\n<p>I mean, you  only have to look at the fashion industry. The minute a new dress hits the  catwalk, the copycats get to work. Next, Primark, you name it. They  unapologetically release clone products as soon as they possibly can. That is  not to say that these things are Versace, or Prada. It&rsquo;s just that imitation is  the best form of flattery &mdash; and imitation should be allowed.<\/p>\n<p>Apple is  pushing its case too strongly. Now, that may be just my opinion, but there&rsquo;s  evidence that the courts are increasingly taking this opinion too. The courts  are getting bored of the patent wars. Increasingly patents are being used to  stifle innovation, rather than enable it. And that&rsquo;s the complete opposite to  the intent of patents in the first place.<\/p>\n<p>Of course,  they&rsquo;re not the only ones. All the big tech companies play the patent game and  suffer patent syndrome. It&rsquo;s just that Apple is increasingly looking like the  giant trying to trample on the rest of the industry. <\/p>\n<p>And as these  trials drag through the courts, the battle on the ground continues. And Android  devices are winning. What&rsquo;s more, with hundreds of Android manufacturers  competing against each other in this space, there&rsquo;s no doubt where the genuine  innovations are now coming from<\/p>\n<p>Apple has had  its day in the sun. Now all it can do is try to fight to maintain its  innovations of yesteryear. And we&rsquo;re all getting bored of it.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Bengt  Saelensminde, <br \/>\n  Contributing Editor, <em>Money Morning<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Ed Note:<\/strong> The above article was originally published in <a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/ift.tt\/PPIcm0\" target=\"_blank\"><em>MoneyWeek<\/em><\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/ift.tt\/141OQNu\" title=\"Join Money Morning on Google Plus -- and read about the things we can't always fit into our regular essays\"><u>Join Money Morning on Google+ <\/u><\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<div class=\"feedflare\">\n<a href=\"http:\/\/ift.tt\/1joVtAD\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/ift.tt\/Nk9u5P\" border=\"0\"><\/img><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/ift.tt\/1fZcvos\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/ift.tt\/1joVvZ6\" border=\"0\"><\/img><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/ift.tt\/1joVtAH\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/ift.tt\/1joVvZ8\" border=\"0\"><\/img><\/a>\n<\/div>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/ift.tt\/1fZcvoz\" height=\"1\" width=\"1\" \/><br \/>\nBy <a href=\"http:\/\/ift.tt\/10cDh0v\" target=\"_blank\"><u>MoneyMorning.com.au<\/u><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>By MoneyMorning.com.au The legal battles surrounding mobile devices, the so-called &lsquo;smartphone patent wars&rsquo;, are absolutely fascinating. Last week saw Samsung and Apple limbering up for another US courtroom drama, with Apple claiming to be the great innovator. We&rsquo;re all supposed to believe that smartphones didn&rsquo;t exist before they came up with their iPhone. While it&rsquo;s &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex-news\/2014\/04\/07\/apple-will-lose-the-smartphone-wars\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Apple Will Lose the Smartphone Wars&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-49492","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49492","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=49492"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49492\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=49492"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=49492"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=49492"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}