{"id":44931,"date":"2013-12-03T19:48:50","date_gmt":"2013-12-04T00:48:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/countingpips.com\/forex-news\/?p=44931"},"modified":"2013-12-03T19:48:50","modified_gmt":"2013-12-04T00:48:50","slug":"the-federal-reserve-must-inflate","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex-news\/2013\/12\/03\/the-federal-reserve-must-inflate\/","title":{"rendered":"The Federal Reserve Must Inflate"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>By <a href=\"http:\/\/www.MoneyMorning.com.au\" target=\"_blank\"><u>MoneyMorning.com.au<\/u><\/a><\/p>\n<p>The <strong>Federal Reserve <\/strong>is  busy doing everything in its considerable power to get credit (that is, debt)  growing again so that we can get back to what it considers to be &#8216;normal&#8217;.<\/p>\n<p>But the  problem is that the recent past was not normal. You may have already seen this  next chart. It shows total debt in the US as a percent of GDP:<\/p>\n<div align=\"center\"><a href=\"http:\/\/portphillippublishing.com.au\/images\/MPR20131204c.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/portphillippublishing.com.au\/images\/MPR20131204c.jpg\" width=\"356\" height=\"272\" border=\"0\"><\/a><br \/>\n<strong>Source: Hoisington Investment Management Company<\/strong><br \/>\n<em><a href=\"http:\/\/portphillippublishing.com.au\/images\/MPR20131204c.jpg\" target=\"_blank\">Click to enlarge<\/a><\/em><\/div>\n<\/p>\n<p>Somewhere right around 1980, things really changed,  and debt began climbing far faster than GDP. And that, right there, is the long  and the short of why any attempt to continue the behaviour that got us to this  point is certain to fail.<\/p>\n<p>It is simply not possible to grow your debts faster  than your income forever. However, that&#8217;s been the practice since 1980, and  current politicians and Federal Reserve officials developed their opinions  about &#8216;how the world works&#8217; during the 33-year period between 1980 and 2013.<\/p>\n<p>Put bluntly, they want to get us back on that same  track, and as soon as possible. The reason? Because every major power centre,  be that in DC or on Wall Street, tuned their thinking, systems, and sense of  entitlement, during that period. <\/p>\n<p>And, frankly, a huge number of financial firms and  political careers will melt away if and when that credit expansion finally  stops. And stop it will; that&#8217;s just a mathematical certainty.<\/p>\n<p>Total Credit Market Debt (TCMD) is a measure of all  the various forms of debt in the US. That includes corporate, state, federal,  and household borrowing. So student loans are in there, as are auto loans,  mortgages, and municipal and <strong>federal debt<\/strong>. <\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s pretty much everything debt-related. What it  does not include, though, are any unfunded obligations, entitlements, or other  types of liabilities. So the Social Security shortfalls are not in there, nor  are the underfunded pensions at the state or corporate levels. TCMD is just  debt, plain and simple.<\/p>\n<p>As you can  see in this next chart, since 1970, TCMD has been growing almost exponentially.<\/p>\n<div align=\"center\"><a href=\"http:\/\/portphillippublishing.com.au\/images\/MPR20131204d.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/portphillippublishing.com.au\/images\/MPR20131204d.jpg\" width=\"360\" height=\"260\" border=\"0\"><\/a><br \/>\n<strong>Source: Mises.org<\/strong><br \/>\n<em><a href=\"http:\/\/portphillippublishing.com.au\/images\/MPR20131204d.jpg\" target=\"_blank\">Click to enlarge<\/a><\/em><\/div>\n<\/p>\n<p>That tiny  little wiggle happened in 2008&ndash;2009, and it apparently nearly brought down the  entire global financial system. That little deviation was practically too much  all on its own for the markets to handle.<\/p>\n<p>Now debts  are climbing again at a quite nice pace. That&#8217;s mainly due to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.moneymorning.com.au\/category\/financial-system\/banks-and-interest-rates\/the-federal-reserve\" title=\"more on the US Federal Reserve\">the Federal Reserve<\/a> monetizing US federal debt just to keep things patched together. As an aside,  based on this chart, we&#8217;d expect the Fed to not end their QE efforts until and  unless households and corporations once more engage in robust borrowing. The  system apparently needs borrowing to keep growing exponentially, or it risks  collapse.<\/p>\n<p>One could  ask why credit can&#8217;t just keep growing. But there are many reasons to believe  that the future will not resemble the past. Let&#8217;s start in 1980, when credit  growth really took off. This period also happens to be the happy time that the Fed is trying (desperately) to recreate. <\/p>\n<p>Between 1980  and 2013, total credit grew by an astonishing 8 percent per year, compounded. I  say &#8216;astonishing&#8217; because anything growing by 8 percent per year will fully  double every 9 years. <\/p>\n<p>So let&#8217;s run  the math experiment and ask what will happen if the Federal Reserve is successful and total  credit grows for the next 30 years at exactly the same rate it did over the  prior 30. That&#8217;s all. This is nothing fancy, and it is simply the same rate of  growth that everybody got accustomed to while they were figuring out &#8216;how the  world works&#8217;.<\/p>\n<p>What happens  to the current $57 trillion in TCMD as it advances by 8 percent per year for 30  years? It mushrooms into a silly number: $573 trillion. That is, an 8 percent  growth paradigm gives us a 10-fold increase in total credit in just 30 years:<\/p>\n<div align=\"center\"><a href=\"http:\/\/portphillippublishing.com.au\/images\/MPR20131204e.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/portphillippublishing.com.au\/images\/MPR20131204e.jpg\" width=\"366\" height=\"260\" border=\"0\"><\/a><br \/>\n<strong>Source: Mises.org<\/strong><br \/>\n<em><a href=\"http:\/\/portphillippublishing.com.au\/images\/MPR20131204e.jpg\" target=\"_blank\">Click to enlarge<\/a><\/em><\/div>\n<\/p>\n<p>For perspective, the GDP of the entire globe was  just $85 trillion in 2012. Even if we advance global GDP by some hefty number,  like 4 percent per year for the next 30 years, under an 8 percent growth  regime, US credit would be twice as large as global GDP in 2043.<\/p>\n<p>If that comparison didn&#8217;t do it for you, then just  ask yourself: Why, exactly, would US corporations, households, and government  borrow more than $500 trillion over the next 30 years?<\/p>\n<p>The total mortgage market is currently $10  trillion, so might the plan include developing an additional 50 more US  residential real estate markets?<\/p>\n<p>So perhaps the situation moderates a bit, and  instead of growing at 8 percent, credit market debt grows at just half that  rate. So what happens if credit just grows by 4 percent per year? That gets us  to $185 trillion, or another $128 trillion higher than today &#8211; a more than 3x  increase. Again: for what will we borrow (only) $128 trillion for, over the  next 30 years?<\/p>\n<p>When I run these numbers, I am entirely confident  that the rate of growth in debt between 1980 and 2013 will not be recreated  between 2013 and 2043. But, I&#8217;ve been assuming that dollars remain valuable. <\/p>\n<p>If dollars were to lose 90 percent or more of their  value (say, perhaps due to our central bank creating too many of them), then  it&#8217;s entirely possible to achieve any sorts of fantastical numbers one wishes  to see.<\/p>\n<p>For the <strong>Fed<\/strong> to achieve anything even close to the historical rate of <strong>credit growth<\/strong>, the dollar will have to lose a lot of value. This may in fact be the Fed&#8217;s grand  plan, and it&#8217;s entirely about keeping the financial system primed with  sufficient new credit to prevent it from imploding.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Chris Martenson<\/strong><br \/>\n    <strong>Contributing Writer, <em>Money Morning <\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Note: This  originally appeared at <a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/www.mises.org\/daily\/6597\/The-Fed-Must-Inflate\">Mises.org<\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/plus.google.com\/106516983215198267222\/about\" title=\"Join Money Morning on Google Plus -- and read about the things we can't always fit into our regular essays\"><u>Join Money Morning on Google+ <\/u><\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<div class=\"feedflare\">\n<a href=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~ff\/MoneyMorningAustralia?a=wwLNeLbpLhQ:PQbutP61fB8:yIl2AUoC8zA\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~ff\/MoneyMorningAustralia?d=yIl2AUoC8zA\" border=\"0\"><\/img><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~ff\/MoneyMorningAustralia?a=wwLNeLbpLhQ:PQbutP61fB8:V_sGLiPBpWU\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~ff\/MoneyMorningAustralia?i=wwLNeLbpLhQ:PQbutP61fB8:V_sGLiPBpWU\" border=\"0\"><\/img><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~ff\/MoneyMorningAustralia?a=wwLNeLbpLhQ:PQbutP61fB8:gIN9vFwOqvQ\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~ff\/MoneyMorningAustralia?i=wwLNeLbpLhQ:PQbutP61fB8:gIN9vFwOqvQ\" border=\"0\"><\/img><\/a>\n<\/div>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~r\/MoneyMorningAustralia\/~4\/wwLNeLbpLhQ\" height=\"1\" width=\"1\" \/><br \/>\nBy <a href=\"http:\/\/www.MoneyMorning.com.au\" target=\"_blank\"><u>MoneyMorning.com.au<\/u><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>By MoneyMorning.com.au The Federal Reserve is busy doing everything in its considerable power to get credit (that is, debt) growing again so that we can get back to what it considers to be &#8216;normal&#8217;. But the problem is that the recent past was not normal. You may have already seen this next chart. It shows &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex-news\/2013\/12\/03\/the-federal-reserve-must-inflate\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;The Federal Reserve Must Inflate&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-44931","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44931","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=44931"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44931\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=44931"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=44931"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=44931"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}