{"id":44196,"date":"2013-11-14T20:04:16","date_gmt":"2013-11-15T01:04:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/countingpips.com\/forex-news\/?p=44196"},"modified":"2013-11-14T20:32:00","modified_gmt":"2013-11-15T01:32:00","slug":"the-myth-about-money-credit-and-gold","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex-news\/2013\/11\/14\/the-myth-about-money-credit-and-gold\/","title":{"rendered":"The Myth About Money, Credit and Gold"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>By <a href=\"http:\/\/www.MoneyMorning.com.au\" target=\"_blank\"><u>MoneyMorning.com.au<\/u><\/a> <\/p>\n<p>The standard  version of how <strong>money<\/strong> came to be goes like this: First, there was barter. (A  handful of nails for a pint of ale!) Then, along came various forms of money.  An evolutionary derby eventually crowned <a href=\"http:\/\/www.moneymorning.com.au\/gold-silver\" title=\"more on gold and silver\">gold and silver<\/a> as the supreme money. <\/p>\n<p>And finally,  credit (or debt) was born. This is the apex of man&#8217;s ascent from  knuckle-dragging barterer to tie-wearing mortgage holder.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s a nice  little story&#8230;except it&#8217;s completely wrong.<\/p>\n<h2>Busting the &#8216;Founding  Myth&#8217; of Economics&nbsp;<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;<em>Our standard account of monetary history is  precisely backward,<\/em>&#8216; writes David Graeber in <em>Debt: The First 5,000 Years<\/em>. &#8216;<em>We  did not begin with barter, discover money and then eventually develop credit  systems. It happened precisely the other way around.<\/em>&#8216;<\/p>\n<p>Graeber&#8217;s  book <em>Debt<\/em> came out in 2011. I didn&#8217;t  pay much attention to it then. After all, who needs to read another book about  debt? But Graeber is an original thinker and provides a perspective you&#8217;ve  probably not seen, since Graeber is not an economist. So he draws from  unfamiliar wells on the topic of money and credit.<\/p>\n<p><strong>David Graeber<\/strong> is  an anthropologist. He&#8217;s studied the record of human civilisations. It&#8217;s nothing  like the economists imagine it. Graeber quotes from numerous economic textbooks  to show how economists perpetuate the mythic progression of barter, money and  then credit.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;(My own favourite, <em>The Mystery of Banking<\/em> by Murray Rothbard, also opens with the same  story.) But anthropologists have long known that the historical evidence does  not support this view. It&#8217;s just that economists seem to have ignored it.<\/p>\n<p>Graeber  calls the barter-money-credit story &#8216;the founding myth&#8217; of economics. Instead,  what really happened first was credit. In small villages and communities, trade  happened on credit. Graeber presents a lot of evidence on this, which I&#8217;ll skip  in the interest of space. <\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;ll just  say it is convincing. And when you think about it, it&#8217;s hard to imagine it  happening any other way. &#8216;<em>It&#8217;s not as if  anyone actually walked into the local pub,<\/em>&#8216; Graeber writes, &#8216;<em>plunked down a roofing nail and asked for a  pint of beer.<\/em>&#8216;<\/p>\n<p>No. What  happened was you ran up a tab. When the occasion permitted, you settled the  debt in some way &#8211; perhaps with a bag of nails or tobacco or a chicken. All  across the village, there would be numerous such &#8216;tabs&#8217; or, essentially,  credits (debts) for all kinds of goods and services. People settled these debts  in broadly agreed-upon ways.<\/p>\n<h2>The Real Truth <\/h2>\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;<em>To this day,<\/em>&#8216; Graeber writes, &#8216;<em>no one has been able to locate a part of the  world where the ordinary mode of economic transaction between neighbors takes  the form of &#8216;I&#8217;ll give you 20 chickens for that cow.&#8217;<\/em>&#8216;<\/p>\n<p>When people  resorted to barter, Graeber says, it was usually to conduct trade with  strangers, or even with enemies. Barter is not even particularly ancient, but  found more in modern times in societies familiar with the use of money but lacking  actual <a href=\"http:\/\/www.moneymorning.com.au\/category\/financial-system\/currency-market\" title=\"more on currency\">currency<\/a> or coinage.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;<em>Elaborate barter systems often crop up in  the wake of the collapse of national economies,<\/em>&#8216; Graeber writes. Russia in  the 1990s is an example, when rubles disappeared. And sometimes a kind of  currency will emerge in place of the old, such as cigarettes in POW camps and  prisons. But all of these are cases where people were already familiar with one  form of money and learned to make do without it.<\/p>\n<p>Not all  economists ignored the historical record of anthropology. Graeber gives a tip  of the cap to one Alfred Mitchell-Innes (1864-1950). He was a British diplomat,  economist and author.<\/p>\n<p>While  serving in the British Embassy in Washington, DC, from 1908-1913, he wrote two  essays about the origin of money and credit for <em>The Banking Law Journal<\/em>. (I&#8217;ve read these essays, which you can  find online. The first is &#8216;What is Money?&#8217; and the second is &#8216;The Credit Theory  of Money&#8217;.)<\/p>\n<p>Mitchell-Innes  laid out the fallacies in the popular story. He relied on numismatics and the  commercial history of ancient and medieval societies. He showed how credit came  first. The sanctity of debt spun the wheels of commerce. Coins (and money) came  later.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;<em>At this point,<\/em>&#8216; Graeber writes of the  time of Mitchell-Innes, &#8216;<em>just about every  aspect of the conventional story of the origins of money lay in rubble. Rarely  has a historical theory been so absolutely and systematically refuted.<\/em>&#8216; Yet  the myth persisted.<\/p>\n<p>Here, I am  barely out of Chapter 2 in my summary of <em>Debt<\/em>.  The book is 500-plus pages. I can&#8217;t do it justice here, but I&#8217;m going to go to  one conclusion that may alter how you think about money. Graeber, though  acknowledging that we can&#8217;t know definitely how money came about, writes  approvingly of one historical theory that says states created money to finance wars.  As Graeber writes:<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;<em>Say a king wishes to support a standing army  of 50,000 men. Under ancient or medieval conditions, feeding such a force was  an enormous problem&#8230; On the other hand, if one simply hands out coins to  soldiers and then demands that every family in the kingdom was obliged to pay  one of those coins back to you<\/em> [to pay taxes]<em>, one would, in one blow, turn one&#8217;s entire national economy into a  vast machine for the provisioning of soldiers, since now every family, in order  to get their hands on the coins, must find some way to contribute to the  general effort to provide soldiers with the things they want.<\/em>&#8216;<\/p>\n<p>Admittedly a  &#8216;cartoon&#8217; version, Graeber says that cash markets did spring up around ancient  armies. The creation of a national debt, then, is essentially a war debt. A  central bank is merely the institutionalisation of the needs of the state and  the interests of financiers to keep the whole machine going.<\/p>\n<p>When Nixon  took the US off the gold standard in 1971, it was in part to help finance the  war in Vietnam. (Think, too, about what this means for<strong> gold<\/strong>. It is no more  &#8216;real money&#8217; than the ink-stained paper governments turn out. If this is right,  gold became money only because states once stamped it and made it money and  accepted it to settle debts and taxes. Otherwise, it&#8217;s just another commodity.)  The US debt made possible a huge military-industrial complex.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;<em>The debt crisis was a direct result of the  need to pay for bombs,<\/em>&#8216; Graeber writes, &#8216;<em>or, to be more precise, the vast military infrastructure required to  deliver them.<\/em>&#8216; Nixon ordered more than 4 million tons of explosives dropped  on Indochina. In a sense, the US military was the only thing backing the US  dollar &#8211; then and now.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;<em>The U.S. debt remains,<\/em>&#8216; Graeber writes,  &#8216;<em>as it has been since 1790, a war debt.<\/em>&#8216;  It is a debt that cannot, and will not, ever be repaid. It is simply rolled  over indefinitely, until the day comes when something else supplants the US  dollar.<\/p>\n<p>In the last  chapter (&#8216;The Beginning of Something&#8230;&#8217;) Graeber concludes that we live in a  new financial age, &#8216;<em>one that nobody  completely understands.<\/em>&#8216; It is an age of credit. But unlike the credit of  old &#8211; dependent on trust and honour &#8211; it is one based on military power and  debt servitude. It is one held together by the threat of violence.<\/p>\n<p>How this  latest phase ends &#8211; as government debts continue to pile up &#8211; is the great  financial question of our times. Graeber&#8217;s book is a thoughtful (and  well-written) addition to the discussion. I enjoyed it. It challenges  long-cherished assumptions and makes you think &#8211; the mark of a good book!<\/p>\n<p><strong>Chris Mayer<\/strong><br \/>\n    <strong>Contributing Editor, <em>Money  Morning <\/em><\/strong><strong><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/plus.google.com\/106516983215198267222\/about\" title=\"Join Money Morning on Google Plus -- and read about the things we can't always fit into our regular essays\"><u>Join Money Morning on Google+ <\/u><\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<div class=\"feedflare\">\n<a href=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~ff\/MoneyMorningAustralia?a=JwcUKjQEMFw:uwF4DCI5wRg:yIl2AUoC8zA\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~ff\/MoneyMorningAustralia?d=yIl2AUoC8zA\" border=\"0\"><\/img><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~ff\/MoneyMorningAustralia?a=JwcUKjQEMFw:uwF4DCI5wRg:V_sGLiPBpWU\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~ff\/MoneyMorningAustralia?i=JwcUKjQEMFw:uwF4DCI5wRg:V_sGLiPBpWU\" border=\"0\"><\/img><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~ff\/MoneyMorningAustralia?a=JwcUKjQEMFw:uwF4DCI5wRg:gIN9vFwOqvQ\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~ff\/MoneyMorningAustralia?i=JwcUKjQEMFw:uwF4DCI5wRg:gIN9vFwOqvQ\" border=\"0\"><\/img><\/a>\n<\/div>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~r\/MoneyMorningAustralia\/~4\/JwcUKjQEMFw\" height=\"1\" width=\"1\" \/><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>By MoneyMorning.com.au The standard version of how money came to be goes like this: First, there was barter. (A handful of nails for a pint of ale!) Then, along came various forms of money. An evolutionary derby eventually crowned gold and silver as the supreme money. And finally, credit (or debt) was born. This is &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex-news\/2013\/11\/14\/the-myth-about-money-credit-and-gold\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;The Myth About Money, Credit and Gold&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-44196","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44196","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=44196"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44196\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=44196"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=44196"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=44196"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}