{"id":44043,"date":"2013-11-11T15:22:47","date_gmt":"2013-11-11T20:22:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/countingpips.com\/forex-news\/?p=44043"},"modified":"2013-11-11T15:22:48","modified_gmt":"2013-11-11T20:22:48","slug":"ewy-vs-dxkw-which-is-the-best-south-korean-etf","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex-news\/2013\/11\/11\/ewy-vs-dxkw-which-is-the-best-south-korean-etf\/","title":{"rendered":"EWY vs. DXKW: Which is the Best South Korean ETF?"},"content":{"rendered":"

By The Sizemore Letter<\/u><\/a><\/p>\n

This month, WidomTree launched a new South-Korea focused ETF, the WisdomTree Korea Hedged Equity Fund <\/b>(<\/span>DXKW<\/a>)<\/span>. This goes head-to-head against a well-entrenched competitor, the iShares MSCI South Korea ETF<\/strong> (<\/span>EWY<\/a>)<\/span>, which trades about 2.5 million shares per day and has assets of about $4.4 billion.<\/p>\n

It also brings up two questions: For one, does WisdomTree’s new offering stack up against the competition? But more broadly, should you invest in South Korea stocks at all?<\/em><\/p>\n

Buying South Korea<\/h3>\n

As I wrote last month, South Korea is a little hard to define<\/a>. Although it tends to get a high weighting in emerging-market funds and ETFs, it’s not an “emerging market.” Its GDP per capita, at around $32,000 by IMF estimates<\/a>, is slightly above the European Union average and is higher than Spain and Italy. As a point of reference, it’s also more than double the level of rising emerging markets such as Mexico and Turkey and nearly triple that of Brazil.<\/p>\n

With living standards comparable to Western Europe, South Korea should be considered a developed market, and fund managers are belatedly starting to accept this. The\u00a0EG Shares Beyond BRICs ETF<\/b>\u00a0(<\/span>BBRC<\/a>)<\/span> — a new entrant in the emerging-market space, specifically excludes South Korea — as well as Taiwan and the four “BRIC” economies of Brazil, Russia, India and China.<\/p>\n

South Korea stocks include several world-class multinationals — among them Samsung<\/strong> (<\/span>SSNLF<\/a>)<\/span>, Posco<\/strong> (<\/span>PKX<\/a>)<\/span>, and\u00a0Hyundai Motor Company<\/strong> (<\/span>HYMTF<\/a>)<\/span> — and its students rank higher than most of their developed-world peers.<\/p>\n

Demographically, South Korea will eventually hit a brick wall. Its fertility rate<\/a>, at 1.24 children per mother, is even lower than that of China and Japan — but that is a long-term problem that won’t be an issue for another couple decades.<\/p>\n

So, yes, you should buy South Korea stocks … at least at the right price. And hey, by Financial Times<\/em> estimates<\/a>, the country is reasonably priced at about 15 times trailing earnings.<\/p>\n

With all of that as an introduction …<\/p>\n

Which ETF Is Best for South Korea Stocks?<\/h3>\n

Based on fees and trading expenses, it’s close to a wash. EWP and DXKW have expense ratios of 0.61% and 0.58%, respectively. EWP has a much larger trading volume — 2.5 million shares per day vs. 4,900 — but DXKW is still a new fund, and its trading volume might be comparable given time.<\/p>\n

Looking at the top holdings of each, we see some familiar names:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
iShares MSCI South Korea (<\/span>EWP<\/a>)<\/span><\/td>\n% of Fund<\/td>\n\u00a0WisdomTree Korea Hedged (<\/span>DXKW<\/a>)<\/span><\/td>\n% of Fund<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Samsung Electronics Co Ltd<\/td>\n\n

22.4%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\u00a0Samsung Electronics Co Ltd<\/td>\n\n

9.5%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Hyundai Motor Co<\/td>\n\n

6.2%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\u00a0Samsung SDI Co. Ltd<\/td>\n\n

6.0%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Posco<\/td>\n\n

3.4%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\u00a0Hyundai Motor Co<\/td>\n\n

5.7%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Hyundai Mobis Co Ltd<\/td>\n\n

3.3%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\u00a0Hyundai Mobis<\/td>\n\n

5.6%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Shinhan Financial Group Ltd<\/td>\n\n

3.0%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\u00a0Kia Motors Corp<\/td>\n\n

5.3%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

SK Hynix Inc<\/td>\n\n

2.7%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\u00a0Hyundai Steel Co<\/td>\n\n

5.1%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Kia Motors Corporation<\/td>\n\n

2.6%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\u00a0LG Chem Ltd<\/td>\n\n

5.0%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Naver Corp<\/td>\n\n

2.6%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\u00a0Posco<\/td>\n\n

4.8%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

LG Chem Ltd<\/td>\n\n

2.1%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\u00a0Hyundai Heavy Industries<\/td>\n\n

4.5%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

KB Financial Group Inc<\/td>\n\n

2.0%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\u00a0KT&G Corp<\/td>\n\n

4.4%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Top 10 Total<\/td>\n\n

50.2%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

Top 10 Total<\/td>\n\n

55.9%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

 <\/p>\n

Although both ETFs essentially hold the same names, DXKW is better diversified. For example, both funds are very heavily weighted toward Samsung Electronics<\/strong> (<\/span>SSNLF<\/a>)<\/span>, but the overweighting is more pronounced in EWY, where fully 22% of the ETF is invested in Samsung Electronics. DXKW has 9.5% invested in Samsung Electronics and another 6% invested in Samsung SDI<\/strong>, a related company that makes lithium batteries.<\/p>\n

And finally, there is currency exposure. EWY is not hedged against movements in the value of the South Korean won, whereas DXKW is. In fact, that is the ETF’s entire reason for existing. Per the fund literature:<\/p>\n

\n

“The WisdomTree Korea Hedged Equity Fund\u00a0can offer you a way to capitalize on the growth potential of South Korea\u2019s exporters while hedging exposure to the Korean won.”<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Of course, this hedging comes at a cost. If the value of the won rises relative to the dollar, you will not profit from this upside.<\/p>\n

The won has added volatility to the Korean market for U.S. and other foreign investors. The currency lost 54% of its value during the Asian financial crisis of 1998, and it lost 41% during the 2008 global crisis. By WisdomTree’s calculations<\/a>, currency movements increased volatility by 8.1% per year over the past decade while only adding 0.8% to returns.<\/p>\n

So, unless you’re particularly bearish on the dollar (or bullish on the won), there is a case to be made for hedging.<\/p>\n

Bottom Line<\/h3>\n

Assuming its trading volume improves, I’m giving the nod to DXKW. At its current trading volume, I can’t recommend it in good faith. It’s just too thinly traded. But once it reaches an acceptable volume of 50,000 to 100,000 shares per day, I would recommend that it be your default option for South Korea stocks. It’s better diversified and offers a measure of protection against currency plunges.<\/p>\n

Charles Lewis Sizemore, CFA, is the chief investment officer of the investment firm Sizemore Capital Management. As of this writing, he did not hold a position in any of the aforementioned securities. Click here<\/a> to receive his FREE 8-part investing series that will not only show you which sectors will soar, but also which stocks will deliver the highest returns. This series starts Nov. 5 and includes a FREE copy of his <\/i>2014 Macro Trend Profit Report.<\/em><\/p>\n

This article first appeared on InvestorPlace<\/a>.<\/p>\n

This article first appeared on Sizemore Insights as EWY vs. DXKW: Which is the Best South Korean ETF?<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Related posts:<\/p>\n