{"id":40795,"date":"2013-08-08T05:49:47","date_gmt":"2013-08-08T09:49:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/countingpips.com\/forex-news\/?p=40795"},"modified":"2013-08-08T05:49:48","modified_gmt":"2013-08-08T09:49:48","slug":"tech-billionaire-jeff-bezos-grossly-overpaid-for-this-dinosaur","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex-news\/2013\/08\/08\/tech-billionaire-jeff-bezos-grossly-overpaid-for-this-dinosaur\/","title":{"rendered":"Tech Billionaire Jeff Bezos Grossly Overpaid for This Dinosaur"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>By <a href=\"http:\/\/WallStreetDaily.com\/\"><u>WallStreetDaily.com<\/u><\/a> <\/p>\n<p>On the heels of eating crow over my prediction that the newspaper industry &#8211; and, in turn, newspaper stocks &#8211; were doomed, <strong>Amazon&#8217;s<\/strong> (<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/finance?q=NASDAQ%3AAMZN&amp;ei=xIUCUtCFLeXF0AHT-wE\">AMZN<\/a>) Founder and digital billionaire, Jeff Bezos, had to go and pile on the punishment.<\/p>\n<p>In a &#8220;thunderbolt&#8221; announcement, as one analyst put it, Bezos pledged $250 million to buy the struggling <em>Washington Post<\/em> from <strong>The Washington Post Co. <\/strong>(<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/finance?q=NYSE%3AWPO&amp;ei=dK8CUsCoMcrx0gGmUw\">WPO<\/a>).<\/p>\n<p>The money came out of his personal bank account, no less.<\/p>\n<p>Now everyone is led to believe that there are gobs of value to be unlocked in other newspapers like <strong>The New York Times<\/strong> (<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/finance?q=NYSE%3ANYT&amp;ei=hK8CUqCYLNO30AHhpAE\">NYT<\/a>) and <em>The Financial Times<\/em>, owned by <strong>Pearson Plc <\/strong>(<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/finance?q=NYSE%3APSO&amp;ei=l68CUpj9J4SX0QGYnAE\">PSO<\/a>).<\/p>\n<p>Case in point: A story at <em>The Daily Beast<\/em> proclaims that the deal &#8220;could help the sales of other major newspapers, such as the <em>Los Angeles Times<\/em> or the <em>Chicago Tribune,<\/em> and if the Sulzbergers ever decide to sell <em>The New York Times,<\/em> they could get around $5 billion.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Total nonsense. Here&#8217;s why&#8230;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Backwards Math<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Last year, the Newspaper Publishing Division for The Washington Post Co. generated about $14.5 million in earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA).<\/p>\n<p>In a buyout, particularly for a struggling business, one would expect a multiple of maybe four or five times EBITDA. Yet Bezos&#8217; purchase price clocks in at a whopping <em>17 times<\/em> EBITDA.<\/p>\n<p>He paid a &#8220;multiple over the multiple,&#8221; as Ken Doctor, Media Analyst at Outsell, told <em>Bloomberg<\/em>. Indeed!<\/p>\n<p>Even Standard &amp; Poor&#8217;s only thought a deal would be worth $80 million, at best.<\/p>\n<p>The only winner in the deal appears to be (go figure) Warren Buffett. At least on paper. On the heels of Bezos&#8217; purchase, shares of The Washington Post Co. hit a five-year high, sending the value of Buffett&#8217;s stake to over $1 billion. (Even at 82 years old, he&#8217;s still got the Midas touch.)<\/p>\n<p>Now, if we apply the same multiple that Bezos paid to, say, The New York Times, it should be worth double its current price. That&#8217;s bad math, given the company&#8217;s continued struggles <em>and<\/em> the stiff industry headwinds.<\/p>\n<p>You see, there&#8217;s just no money to be made by selling <em>newspapers<\/em>. All the money is supposed to come from selling <em>advertising<\/em> in newspapers.<\/p>\n<p>But guess what? That&#8217;s not happening, either.<\/p>\n<p>Last year, total newspaper advertising revenue fell to its lowest annual level since 1950, when the Newspaper Association of America started tracking the data.<\/p>\n<p>As Dr. Mark Perry of the American Enterprise Institute puts it, &#8220;The dramatic decline in newspaper ad revenues has to be one of the most significant Schumpeterian gales of creative destruction in the last decade.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">\u00a0<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone\" alt=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/www.wallstreetdaily.com\/wallstreet-research\/charts\/0813_Hospice.png\" width=\"500\" height=\"400\" \/><\/p>\n<p>And according to Perry (and I agree), the trend isn&#8217;t &#8220;even close to being over.&#8221; But unless it reverses course, there&#8217;s no way The New York Times would ever be worth anything close to $4 or $5 billion. Let alone its current valuation of $1.8 billion.<\/p>\n<p>Nevertheless, don&#8217;t expect The Grey Lady to ever run this headline: &#8220;Jeff Bezos (Grossly) Overpaid.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Although the paper&#8217;s controlling family swears they&#8217;re not interested in selling, there&#8217;s no doubt that they secretly hope they can fetch such a sweet premium when they do finally decide to cash out. Hence the softball headlines we&#8217;re seeing about the deal &#8211; like &#8220;Bezos Brings Promise of Innovation to Washington Post.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>He better! Otherwise, he might find himself unloading the flagship newspaper to some other chump in a fire sale down the road.<\/p>\n<p>Kind of like The New York Times just did with The Boston Globe. After paying $1.1 billion in 1993, the company unloaded it to Red Sox owner, John Henry, for $70 million &#8211; or about $0.07 on the dollar. (Ouch!)<\/p>\n<p>Ironically, a report in <em>The Washington Post<\/em> best depicts the formidable obstacle Bezos needs to overcome if his gamble is going to pay off:<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;But for much of the past decade, <em>The Post<\/em> has been unable to escape the financial turmoil that has engulfed newspapers and other &#8216;legacy&#8217; media organizations. The rise of the internet and the epochal change from print to digital technology have created a massive wave of competition for traditional news companies, scattering readers and advertisers across a radically altered news and information landscape and triggering mergers, bankruptcies and consolidation among the owners of print and broadcasting properties.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>I guess when you&#8217;re a billionaire there&#8217;s nothing better to do with a couple hundred million than to bet it against all odds. (Must be nice.)<\/p>\n<p>For us lowly retail investors, though, it makes no sense whatsoever to take such outsized risks.<\/p>\n<p>Bottom line: Investing in newspaper stocks based on the prospect of a takeover is an investment strategy fraught with risk. Don&#8217;t take it.<\/p>\n<p>Ahead of the tape,<\/p>\n<p>Louis Basenese<\/p>\n<p>The post <a href=\"http:\/\/www.wallstreetdaily.com\/2013\/08\/08\/jeff-bezos-buys-washington-post\/\">Tech Billionaire Jeff Bezos Grossly Overpaid for This Dinosaur<\/a> appeared first on <a href=\"http:\/\/www.wallstreetdaily.com\">&nbsp;| Wall Street Daily<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Article By <a href=\"http:\/\/WallStreetDaily.com\/\"><u>WallStreetDaily.com<\/u><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Original Article: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.wallstreetdaily.com\/2013\/08\/08\/jeff-bezos-buys-washington-post\/\">Tech Billionaire Jeff Bezos Grossly Overpaid for This Dinosaur<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>By WallStreetDaily.com On the heels of eating crow over my prediction that the newspaper industry &#8211; and, in turn, newspaper stocks &#8211; were doomed, Amazon&#8217;s (AMZN) Founder and digital billionaire, Jeff Bezos, had to go and pile on the punishment. In a &#8220;thunderbolt&#8221; announcement, as one analyst put it, Bezos pledged $250 million to buy &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex-news\/2013\/08\/08\/tech-billionaire-jeff-bezos-grossly-overpaid-for-this-dinosaur\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Tech Billionaire Jeff Bezos Grossly Overpaid for This Dinosaur&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-40795","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40795","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=40795"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40795\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=40795"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=40795"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=40795"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}