{"id":38164,"date":"2013-05-08T13:09:45","date_gmt":"2013-05-08T17:09:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/countingpips.com\/forex-news\/?p=38164"},"modified":"2013-05-08T13:09:45","modified_gmt":"2013-05-08T17:09:45","slug":"review-the-most-important-thing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex-news\/2013\/05\/08\/review-the-most-important-thing\/","title":{"rendered":"Review: The Most Important Thing"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/sizemoreletter.com\/\" target=\"blank\"><u>By The Sizemore Letter<\/u><\/a> <\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/gp\/product\/0231162847\/ref=as_li_ss_il?ie=UTF8&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=0231162847&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;tag=marcombychale-20\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright\" style=\"border: 0px\" alt=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/ws.assoc-amazon.com\/widgets\/q?_encoding=UTF8&amp;ASIN=0231162847&amp;Format=_SL160_&amp;ID=AsinImage&amp;MarketPlace=US&amp;ServiceVersion=20070822&amp;WS=1&amp;tag=marcombychale-20\" width=\"106\" height=\"160\" border=\"0\" \/><\/a><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" style=\"border: none !important;margin: 0px !important\" alt=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/www.assoc-amazon.com\/e\/ir?t=marcombychale-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=0231162847\" width=\"1\" height=\"1\" border=\"0\" \/><br \/>\nIf Warren Buffett, Christopher Davis, Joel Greenblatt and Seth Klarman recommend a book, it might\u2014just might\u2014be worth reading.\u00a0\u00a0 It certainly got my attention.<\/p>\n<p>Warren Buffett calls Howard Marks\u2019 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/gp\/product\/0231162847\/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=0231162847&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;tag=marcombychale-20\"><i>The Most Important Thing <\/i><\/a>\u201cthat rarity, a useful book.\u201d \u00a0And as a researcher with a library of a couple hundred books myself, I couldn\u2019t agree more.<\/p>\n<p>For those unfamiliar with Howard Marks, he is the Chairman and cofounder of Oaktree Capital Management, an investment firm with $77 billion under management<i>.\u00a0 The Most Important Thing Illuminated<\/i>, published in 2013, is an update to Marks\u2019 original, published in 2011, though in <i>Illuminated <\/i>Marks has help.\u00a0 Greenblatt, managing partner of Gotham Capital and author of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.assoc-amazon.com\/e\/ir?t=marcombychale\"><i>The Little Book That Beats the Market<\/i><\/a>, offers his own commentary throughout the pages, as do Christopher Davis, portfolio manager of the Davis Large Cap Value fund, and Seth Klarman, president of The Baupost Group and a well-respected value investor.\u00a0 Marks keeps good company.<\/p>\n<p>I had high expectations when I picked up <i>The Most Important Thing Illuminated, <\/i>and I wasn\u2019t disappointed.\u00a0 This isn\u2019t yet another \u201chow to invest\u201d book or a tired rehashing of received investment \u201cwisdom\u201d that looks more like something found in a fortune cookie and which rarely seems to hold up in practice.<\/p>\n<p>Instead, Marks gives us the insightful thoughts of a man who struggles with his own investing decisions on a daily basis.\u00a0 There are no shortcuts, formulas, or easy tricks.\u00a0 But there is a wealth of experience and thoughtful contemplation from a real \u201cin the trenches\u201d investor who has been doing this a long time.<\/p>\n<p>Marks starts the book with a chapter on \u201csecond-level thinking,\u201d and I consider this one of the most valuable lessons in the entire book.\u00a0 Having a good understanding of this chapter alone will put you head and shoulders above most of your peers.<\/p>\n<p>Mechanical trading rules work really well\u2026right up until the point that they don\u2019t.\u00a0 And why don\u2019t they work consistently over time?\u00a0 As Marks explains,<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p><i>The reasons are simple.\u00a0 No rule always works.\u00a0 The environment isn\u2019t controllable, and circumstances rarely repeat exactly.\u00a0 Psychology plays a major role in markets, and because it\u2019s highly variable, cause-and-effect relationships aren\u2019t reliable. An investment approach may work for a while, but eventually the actions it calls for will change the environment, meaning a new approach is needed.\u00a0 And if others emulate an approach, that will blunt its effectiveness.<\/i><\/p>\n<p><i>Investing, like economics, is more art than science.\u00a0 And that means it can get a little messy.<\/i><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>\u201cMessy\u201d is not a technical term, but it is accurate and descriptive hear.\u00a0 Markets are driven by people and by ever-changing real-world events.\u00a0 Trying to cram this into a mechanical trading model or a black box is a recipe for disaster.\u00a0 And frankly, it\u2019s mentally lazy and reflects and unwillingness (or inability!) to grasp complexity.<\/p>\n<p>This brings me to Marks\u2019 points about second-level thinking.\u00a0 What exactly is \u201csecond-level thinking.\u201d\u00a0 Perhaps it is best explained by example:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>\u201cFirst-level thinking says, \u2018It\u2019s a good company let\u2019s buy the stock.\u2019\u00a0 Second-level thinking says, \u2018It\u2019s a good company, but everyone thinks it\u2019s a great company, and it\u2019s not.\u00a0 So the stock\u2019s overrated and overpriced; let\u2019s sell.\u2019\u201d<\/li>\n<li>\u201cFirst-level thinking says, \u201cThe outlook calls for low growth and rising inflation. Let\u2019s dump our stocks.\u2019 Second level thinking says, \u2018The outlook stinks, but everyone else is selling in panic.\u00a0 Buy!\u2019\u201d<\/li>\n<li>\u201cFirst-level thinking says, \u2018I think the company\u2019s earnings will fall; sell.\u2019 Second-level thinking says, \u2018I think the company\u2019s earnings will fall less than people expect, and the pleasant surprise will lift the stock; buy.\u2019\u201d<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Call it contrarian thinking, applied game theory, or just being clever, but this is the mindset that is required to be a successful investor over time.\u00a0 It\u2019s also a skill that few investors have or have the mental discipline to use.<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s not easy going against the grain and taking views that are contrary to the consensus.\u00a0 But then, no one ever said that investing should be easy.<\/p>\n<h2><strong>Market Technicals and Psychology<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>As a value investor, Marks is not a fan of technical analysis (i.e. charting) but he does stress the importance of understanding what he calls \u201cmarket technicals,\u201d or non-fundamental factors that affect the supply and demand for a security.\u00a0 Failing to understand these can lure an investor who looks at value alone.<\/p>\n<p>What are some examples?\u00a0 Marks lists two specifically: the forced selling that takes place when a market crash trips margin calls, which forces leveraged investors to sell at any price, and the cash inflows that go to mutual funds that are usually invested irrespective of price.\u00a0 To these I would add short squeezes, secondary stock price offerings that dilute shareholders, and buyout offers.<\/p>\n<p>These technical factors are often closely related to market psychology.\u00a0 And as Marks writes, \u201cThe discipline that is most important Is not accounting or economics, but psychology\u2026<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>Investing is a popularity contest, and the most dangerous thing is to buy something at the peak of its popularity.\u00a0 At that point, all favorable facts and opinions are already factored into its price, and no new buyers are left to emerge.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Need an example?\u00a0 Think of Apple\u2019s performance over the past few years.\u00a0 Apple was the \u201cmust own\u201d stock of the 2010s.\u00a0 <i>Everyone<\/i> owned it\u2014individual investors, mutual fund managers, hedge fund managers\u2026you name the investor, and chances are good that Apple made up a good-sized chunk of their portfolio.<\/p>\n<p>There were cases of focused hedge funds having 20-30% of their portfolio in Apple.\u00a0 Even now, after Apple\u2019s massive slide, the stock accounts for nearly 15% of the <strong>Technology Select SPDR (NYSE:<a href=\"http:\/\/stocktwits.com\/symbol\/XLK\" class=\"ticker\"><span>$<\/span>XLK<\/a>)<\/strong>, one of the most popular ETFs for investing in the tech sector.\u00a0 Apple\u2019s position in the ETF is bigger than Google\u2019s and IBM\u2019s combined.<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s not a figure of speech to say that there was no one left to buy Apple.\u00a0 No matter how great a company is, there is a limit to how high a percentage of investors\u2019 portfolios it could comprise.<\/p>\n<p>And we all know what followed.\u00a0 Apple\u2019s share price fell by over 40%, and may or may not be finished falling.<\/p>\n<p>A pure value investor wouldn\u2019t have seen the risk in Apple.\u00a0 Based on popular metrics such as price\/earnings or price\/sales, Apple wasn\u2019t particularly expensive.\u00a0 It actually looked pretty cheap compared to the broader market.<\/p>\n<p>But if you had taken market technical and investor psychology into account, you would have known to be wary.\u00a0 You almost certainly wouldn\u2019t have timed the top perfectly, but you would have known that caution was warranted.<\/p>\n<p>Unfortunately, as Marks acknowledges, <i>\u201cpsychology is elusive\u2026and the psychological factors that weigh on other investors\u2019 minds and influence their actions will weigh on yours as well.\u201d<\/i><\/p>\n<p>There are no shortcuts here.\u00a0 You have to remain as dispassionate as possible and, where possible, try to apply second-level thinking.<\/p>\n<h2><strong>Thoughts on Risk<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>Risk is one of the most difficult concepts in investing because it is impossible to quantity.\u00a0 Yes, we have measures such as standard deviation, variance, or beta, but these measure volatility.\u00a0 Volatility and risk are not at all the same thing.<\/p>\n<p>A better definition of risk is the possibility of loss.\u00a0 But even this is hard to define or quantify in any meaningful way.\u00a0 And at the time when a stock appears the most risky\u2014such as after a recent volatile drop\u2014it may actually be relatively less risky, as the selloff shook out the less committed investors.\u00a0 And on the flip side, it is when a stock looks least risky\u2014think Apple this time last year\u2014when it is in fact most at risk.<\/p>\n<p>And it gets more complicated than that.\u00a0 You can\u2019t gauge the riskiness\u2014or the quality\u2014of a trade based on what happened.\u00a0 You have to base it on what <i>could<\/i> have happened.<\/p>\n<p>In other words, you can take a phenomenally bad gamble with negative expected returns and still come out ahead.\u00a0 But that doesn\u2019t mean it was a good decision.\u00a0 Let me state it bluntly: A good <i>outcome<\/i> does not mean that the decision that led to it was a good one.<\/p>\n<p>If you don\u2019t understand what I\u2019m talking about, you should probably stop reading.\u00a0 And you should <i>definitely<\/i> stop investing.<\/p>\n<p>Winning the lottery is a fantastic outcome.\u00a0 But the expected value on any given lottery ticket is negative because the possibility of a payoff is infinitesimally small. Most people would agree that winning the lottery is good luck.\u00a0 But, being overconfident in their own abilities, they fail to see the role of luck in good investment returns based on bad trading.<\/p>\n<p>Marks, in thinking very similar to that of <i>Black Swan<\/i> guru Nassim Taleb, does a good job of explaining this:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p><i>A few years ago, while considering the difficulty of measuring risk prospectively, I realized that because of its latent, nonquantitative and subjective nature, the risk of an investment\u2014defined as the likelihood of loss\u2014can\u2019t be measured in retrospect any more than it can a priori.<\/i><\/p>\n<p><i>Let\u2019s say you make an investment that works out as expected. Does that mean it wasn\u2019t risky?\u2026 Perhaps it exposed you to great potential uncertainties that didn\u2019t materialize\u2026.<\/i><\/p>\n<p><i>Need a model?\u00a0 Think of the weatherman.\u00a0 He says there is a 70 percent chance of rain tomorrow.\u00a0 It rains; was he right or wrong?<\/i><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>It\u2019s easy to get overly academic here and veer off into directions that are not particularly practical.\u00a0 Perhaps it can be summed up with the old Wall Street adage to \u201cNever confuse brains with a bull market.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>More broadly, we should always remember that risk is a complicated concept and that we can\u2019t get complacent in our investment process.\u00a0 When you have capital at risk, you need to be vigilant.<\/p>\n<p>Does this mean we should avoid risk?\u00a0 Not at all.\u00a0 As Marks puts it, <i>\u201crisk avoidance is likely to lead to return avoidance.\u201d<\/i>\u00a0 Assuming risk is part of the investment game.\u00a0 It is just a matter of keeping risk under control and making sure that the returns we realistically expect are worth the risk we are taking.<\/p>\n<h2><strong>On Cycles<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>While Marks eschews charting and most forms of technical analysis, he does have respect for market cycles.\u00a0 In fact, he offers two rules for investing with a mind to cycles:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Rule number one: Most things will prove to be cyclical<\/li>\n<li>Rule number two: some of the greatest opportunities for gain and loss come when other people forget rule number one.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Marks\u2019 interest in cycles ties back to his belief in the importance of market psychology:<\/p>\n<p><i>Objective factors do play a large part in cycles, of course\u2014factors such as quantitative relationships, world events, environmental changes, technological developments and corporate decisions. But it\u2019s the application of psychology to such things that causes investors to overreact or underreact and thus determines the amplitude of the cyclical fluctuations\u2026<\/i><\/p>\n<p><i>Cycles are self-correcting, and their reversal is not necessarily dependent on exogenous events.\u00a0 They reverse (rather than going on forever) because trends create the reasons for their own reversal.\u00a0 Thus, I like to say success carries within itself the seeds of failure, and failure the seeds of success.<\/i><\/p>\n<p>Well said.\u00a0 Marks\u2019 views are consistent with those of Hyman Minsky, who believed that stability inevitably leads to instability (and vice versa) because stability encourages risky behavior and instability prompts more sober behavior.<\/p>\n<p>Within the markets, a long period of stability and growth leads investors to assign higher and higher earnings multiples to stocks\u2014think of the 1980s and 1990s.\u00a0 But during long periods of economic malaise and market turmoil, investors assign lower and lower earnings multiples.\u00a0 This cycle is probably the one permanent fixture throughout the history of the capital markets.<\/p>\n<p>Marks offers so specific trading strategy to trade cycle fluctuations; his intent is simply to offer a word of advice to not ignore them.<\/p>\n<p>In this book review, I have barely scratched the surface of <i>The Most Important Thing<\/i>.\u00a0 This book is chocked full of very accessible, very down-to-earth investment advice, and the praise heaped on it by Buffett, Klarman and the rest is well deserved.\u00a0 This is a book that I recommend you keep on your desk and thumb through on those days where the market isn\u2019t making sense and you need a little grounding.<\/p>\n<p>Compliments on a book well written.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/sizemoreletter.us2.list-manage.com\/subscribe?u=9d96acebea38ce5045e6823c8&amp;id=49e6f885bb\">SUBSCRIBE\u00a0<\/a><\/strong>to\u00a0<em>Sizemore Insights<\/em>\u00a0via e-mail today.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<div class='yarpp-related-rss'>\n<p>Related posts:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><a href='http:\/\/charlessizemore.com\/review-whats-behind-the-numbers\/' rel='bookmark' title='Review: What&#8217;s Behind the Numbers?'>Review: What&#8217;s Behind the Numbers?<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href='http:\/\/charlessizemore.com\/review-of-john-mauldins-endgame\/' rel='bookmark' title='Review of John Mauldin&#8217;s Endgame'>Review of John Mauldin&#8217;s Endgame<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href='http:\/\/charlessizemore.com\/review-the-big-retirement-risk\/' rel='bookmark' title='Book Review: The Big Retirement Risk'>Book Review: The Big Retirement Risk<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>By The Sizemore Letter If Warren Buffett, Christopher Davis, Joel Greenblatt and Seth Klarman recommend a book, it might\u2014just might\u2014be worth reading.\u00a0\u00a0 It certainly got my attention. Warren Buffett calls Howard Marks\u2019 The Most Important Thing \u201cthat rarity, a useful book.\u201d \u00a0And as a researcher with a library of a couple hundred books myself, I &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex-news\/2013\/05\/08\/review-the-most-important-thing\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Review: The Most Important Thing&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-38164","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38164","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=38164"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38164\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=38164"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=38164"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmacro.com\/forex-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=38164"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}